Die Zeit der Manifeste – Manie, Hypie oder Faszination?

Vor ein paar Wochen habe ich in einem Interview mit dem Internet World Magazin von einem Kulturwandel gesprochen, der mit der Evolution des (oder Revolution durch das) Social Web einhergeht. In der Vergangenheit gingen zahlreichen Kulturwandeln tiefgreifende Manifeste voran, die die Ziele und Absichten einer Gesellschaft im Wandel in sich tragen.

Nun ist ein Manifest kein Blog-Post, kein Whitepaper und keine Strategie-Abhandlung. Oder im Social Web Zeitalter dann doch? Manifeste entstehen in schwierigen Zeiten ideologischer und kultureller Umbruchstimmung in der Gesellschaft. Jeder in der Gesellschaft spürt die Umbruchstimmung. Jeder nimmt die Unruhe im Geiste wahr. Kluge Köpfe formulieren die Wünsche sowie die zukünftige Wegbereitung in Thesen. Die Absicht: Der Masse Orientierung und Antworten zu geben.

Der derzeitige Kulturwandel findet in schriftlicher Form eine kreative Energie, die sich in diversen Manifesten niederschlägt – publiziert zumeist von (Social) Web-Experten. Allein im Jahr 2010 sind inzwischen 3! Internet-Manifeste erschienen.

Manie, Hype oder Faszination? Es wirkt fast so, als schafften sich manche (Social) Web Professionals mit einem Internet-Manifest ein Denkmal. Was mit dem Cluetrain Manifest begann, findet euphorische, motivierte Nachahmer, die ebenfalls Manifeste in die soziale Web Diskussion einfließen lassen.

Eine Übersicht…

Cluetrain Manifest
Autoren: Chris Locke, Doc Searls, David Weinberger, Rick Levine
April, 1999

Tom’s Re-imagine Manifesto!
Ten Good Reasons to “Get Up in the Morning”
Autor: Tom Peters
Juli 2005

The Happy at Work Manifesto
Autor: Alexander Kjerulf
Juli 2007

Das Internet-Manifest
Wie Journalismus heute funktioniert. 17 Behauptungen.
Autoren: Zahlreiche Journalisten
September 2009

Slow Media Manifest
Autoren: Sabria David, Jörg Blumtritt und Benedikt Köhler
Januar 2010

Media Manifest
12 Thesen zur künftigen Media-Messung
Autor: David Eicher/Webguerillas
Feburar 2010

Rubicon Manfest
Principles of a REVVOLUTION or, the ad server is dead
Autor: Rubicon Project
Februar 2010

In der Ära des Social Web sprechen alle von Nachhaltigkeit, was das Cluetrain Manifest definitiv bewiesen hat. Und wie sieht es mit den anderen Manifesten aus? Wie denken Social Web Professionals über diese neuen Manifeste? Was bringen solche Manifeste? Welche Art von Manifesten brauchen Unternehmen für die Zukunft? Ein paar akademische Meinungen habe ich vorab schonmal angefragt. Und freue mich auf Eure Kommentare…

Lest selbst…

Prof. Harald Eichsteller, Hochschule der Medien (HdM)
“Ein Manifest symbolisiert, dass das schwelende Gefühl einer großen Gruppe oder Bewegung sich materialisiert, aufgeschrieben und schließlich publiziert wird – ob als Anschlag an einer Kirchentür, als Buch oder im World Wide Web. Nach Luther und Marx haben sich rechtzeitig vor Ende des Jahrtausend führende Köpfe im Cluetrain Manifest zusammengetan, um der Tradition mit 95 Thesen neuen Schwung zu geben – und das wurde dann in immer kürzeren Zeitabschnitten dankbar von einigen aufgegriffen.

Erwähnenswert das 15-thesige Slow Media Manifest, das auf den ersten Blick die Tradition des intellektuellen Anspruchs der Manifestierer der letzten Jahrhunderte fortsetzt und sicherlich das schwelende Gefühl einer beachtlich großen Gruppe im digitalen Alltags-Dschungel Gehetzter widerspiegelt. Das Media-Manifest kommt mit 12 Thesen aus und lehnt sich optisch stark an die historischen Vorbilder an; es bleibt allerdings nicht verborgen, dass es sich um das Akquisitionstool einer Agentur handelt, auch wenn inhaltlich die grundsätzlichen Marketing-Tendenzen des neuen Jahrzehnts trefflich skizziert sind.

Bleiben einige Fragen: Brauchen wir jetzt in immer kürzer werden Abständen ständig neue Internet-Manifeste? Ist es legal, die von Luther und Cluetrain vorgegebene Zahl von fünfundneunzig auf ein Dutzend oder wenig mehr zu reduzieren? Ist ein Manifest nicht immer non-profit? Oder: Ist nach dem Cluetrain Manifest jetzt nicht wieder Ruhe angesagt und wir beschäftigen uns jetzt 100 Jahre mit den Konsequenzen und der Verarbeitung dessen, was da so schwelte, uns alle überrumpelte und wir nun eine ganze Zeitlang brauchen werden, um uns freizustrampeln und unsere eigene Linie zu finden?”

Prof. Dr. Klemens Skibicki, Deutsches Institut für Kommunikation und Recht im Internet (DIKRI)
“Karl Marx und Friedrich Engels beschrieben in ihrem Kommunistischen Manifest 1848 diese Unruhe als „ein Gespenst geht um in Europa…“ Damals konnte zwar jeder den gesellschaftlichen Umbruch der industriellen Revolution mit dem Wachsen der Städte, industrieller Massenproduktionsweisen und dem Entstehen der Arbeiterschicht als einer neuen gesellschaftlichen Schicht sehen und den neuen Geist spüren – die Macht und die Auswirkungen waren jedoch kaum zu überblicken. Jahre später führten die einst verfassten Grundlagen zu neuen Machtorganisationen wie den sozialdemokratischen Parteien und andernorts sogar zu blutigen Revolutionen wie in Russland.

Die Autoren der „95 Thesen des Cluetrain Manifests“ von 1999 waren ihrer Zeit genauso voraus als sie die Basisthese „Märkte sind Gespräche“ formulierten. Geschichtsbewusst drückten sie die Kraft dieser Aussagen durch die Anlehnung der Titelwahl an die 95 Thesen von Martin Luther und das Marx`sche Kommunistische Manifest an – elegant, aber nur für eine kleine Elite verständlich. Ein Jahrzehnt später wird die mächtige Veränderung durch die neuen Kräfte von Facebook, YouTube, Twitter & Co auch von der Masse abseits der Vordenker gespürt. So wie sich bürgerliche Schichten im 19. Jahrhundert sich teilweise durch die neuen Kräfte bedroht fühlten, werden heute langsam alle Branchen erfasst und viele fürchten um ihre Geschäftsmodelle, so dass sie Orientierung und neue Leitlinien für die Social Media Revolution suchen. Diese Suche mündet in der Formulierung solcher Manifeste als Antwortmöglichkeiten – wobei ich unsicher bin, ob den meisten der historische Kontext der Wortwahl geläufig ist ;-)

Die Frage der Notwendigkeit solcher Manifeste zu diesem Zeitpunkt ist für diejenigen, die schon seit Jahren bewusster Teil des Ganzen sind, zu verneinen – das Erwartete ist eingetreten. Die Masse ist aber bekanntlich träge und braucht länger, um die Welt um sie herum zu verstehen – wenn die Formulierungen Ihnen helfen und sie die richtigen Schlüsse für ihr Business ziehen können – warum dann nicht?”

Richard Joerges, Becker.Joerges.agile communication.
“Manifest ist ein großes Wort für große politische Ziele und Programme, vom Kommunistischen Manifest, bis zum Manifest der 2.000 Worte im Prager Frühling. Da mitzuhalten wird für so manches neue so genannte Manifest schwierig. Cluetrain Manifesto, ok. Das schlug ein wie eine Bombe und letztendlich zehrt unser Berufsstand immer noch davon. Aber jede noch so gute neue Idee gleich in ein Manifest packen? Sind Programm, Absichtserklärung, Verhaltenskodex nicht meistens die adäquateren Worte?

Die Bereitschaft im Mitmach-Web, Erfahrungswerte und Vorstellungen via eines Manifestes in ein gemeinsames Verständnis und bestimmte Zielsetzungen mit Blickrichtung Zukunft fließen zu lassen, sind unschätzbare Momente der Kulturentwicklung durch Kommunikation und Diskussion. Jedoch sollten sie angesichts der wachsenden Zahl von Veröffentlichungen nicht überbewertet werden. Gerade bei Ideen, die wichtige Zusammenhänge oft verkürzen oder zugespitzt Außenwirkung und Verbreitung anpeilen, laufen Gefahr, inhaltlicher Breite und qualitative Tiefenschärfe zu vernachlässigen. Einer Idee folgt die nächste, doch an Optionen für eine realitätsnahe Einordnung mangelt es. Häufig folgt prompt die nächste Veröffentlichung zum Thema – auf Kosten fokussierter Aufmerksamkeit.

Bestenfalls bleiben Ideensammlungen hilfreiche Anregungen, um Diskussionen zu fördern und Alltagssituationen einzuschätzen. Zu Manifesten geraten sie dadurch jedoch nicht. Denn auch zuviel Pathos macht manchmal verwechselbar.”

Stefan Pfeiffer, IBM Deutschland
“Derzeit nehme ich sehr viel Negativberichterstattung zum Netz wahr. Es wird gewarnt, gewarnt, gewarnt … Und die positiven Möglichkeiten fallen hinten runter. Ich glaube wir brauchen vor allem Aufklärung und Ausbildung für die Anwender im Umgang mit dem Netz. Im Unternehmen können hier Social Media Guidelines helfen. Nicht im Sinne von Vorschriften sondern Hilfestellung.”

Gerald Hensel, Neue Digitale / Razorfish
“Ich persönlich mag ja Definitionen. Eigentlich könnte man meinen, dass ich deshalb auch Manifeste mag, aber tatsächlich glaube ich, dass es sich hier fast immer um PR-Vehikel dreht. Ausnahmen bestätigen bekanntlich auch hier die Regel: Das Cluetrain Manifesto ist ein inhaltlicher Meilenstein in der Industrie und sollte von jedem gelesen werden. Dass aber Hinz und Kunz 10 unbelegte und normalerweise mässig argumentierte Thesen neu übertiteln und das dann ein Manifest nennen, finde ich eher ziemlich peinlich. ”

Spot On!
Manifeste können initiieren, revolutionieren und zum Umdenken anregen. Ja, ich unterschreibe “Slow Media” – erscheint notwendig ohne Personal Web Manager. Ja, “Cost-Per-Thousand Dialogues” klingt spannend. Doch kommt nicht “Cost-Per-Unique User” zuerst? Ja, Publisher brauchen eine effizientere Vermarktung, aber gleich ein Manifest kreieren und dann als Selbstzweck zu vermarkten? Ich weiß nicht…

Natürlich interessiert mich Eure Meinung! Lasst Eurem Geist freien Lauf zum diesem Thema Manifeste. Vielleicht entsteht ja so ein neues z.B. Social Web Manifest, mit Nachhaltigkeit – welches auch in 10 Jahren noch so glänzt, wie das Cluetrain Manifest heute.

BreakingPoint: Insights in their social media strategy

Yesterday, I was refering to the case study by BreakingPoint to show the impact of social media for lead generation. And I promised to get some feedback from the responsible person at BreakingPoint on how they made these results happen. Kyle Flaherty gave me some insights in BreakiingPoint Systems social media strategy which I am allowed to share with you.

In his eyes, the succes of companies with social media needs to follow a company’s philosophy in a way that “social media should not be a separate entity in the marketing or communications strategy, in fact it must be part of your company DNA if it is to be successful.”

The main question I was asking myself was how they at BreakingPoint organize their social media activities and content production. Kyle told me that it was a long learning curve. Today, he is working with a team of eight bloggers (all highly technical) who fill their Twitter program (nearly 25% of company members are on Twitter), Facebook, LinkedIn Groups, corporate blog, etc. And he describes the content production process as follows:

“For our blog it is a very organic process, which I believe works best. I send notes out to potential bloggers each month discussing certain themes and asking if folks are working on anything in particular. This sparks some thoughts around blog posts, which they send my way for editing and SEO. As for LinkedIn, every member is put through a qualification process and given very clear engagement rules for the group. I enforce these from time to time by explaining to people how they should engage, kicking out spammers, etc. I also will go into the group on a daily basis and pose a question to start up conversation and ask particular members to respond in order to facilitate communication.”

The question of people who want to involved in social media is always: What is the overall investment in starting social media activities? Kyle responds that the investment was not massive spendings. Although it has to be said that Kyle managed web development projects for years in his last job which probably saved the company some dollars.

“Two specific areas we spend money when it comes to social media. First is with equipment for podcasts and video, which is an important element of our social media strategy. In 2009 I spent only $2,000 (U.S) for equipment. The other element is our website and the development of a new blog (debuting in February!). This is obviously a more substantial cost, but one we would have done no matter what. In my opinion a good site development, depending on what you are doing, can be done for around $15,000 (note that I managed web dev projects for years in my last job). Otherwise our budget is spent on “traditional” marketing areas such as drip email marketing, events, demand gen, etc. But it is important to note that we integrate social media with each of these elements.“

From a sustainability point of view it is often argued that social media can save money as a positive factor compared to traditional marketing. Kyle tells me that using social media is not a tactic to save money but that the budgets spent follow the same KPI rules of traditional marketing efforts.

“We worry less about saving money and more about making our activities work for us. For example, we map nearly every dollar spent back to sales. If a marketing activity, whether traditional or social media focused, is not brining in sales we do not engage in that activity for much longer.”

Today, 30% of their generated leads are coming from social media activities – and all leads are new contacts.

Kyle Flaherty is Director Marketing and Communications and manages external communications, community relationships and influencer marketing at BreakingPoint. He also blogs on b2b marketing topics on his personal blog Dance with strangers.

Social Web: “When you decide to jump in, resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell.” – Interviewing Scott Monty

At the Detroit motor show 2010 Ford executives from around the world spent one entire day engaging with Ford Fans and online influencers on social web platforms like Twitter, Facebook, BlogTalkRadio, CoverItLive, and more.

TheStrategyWeb was given the chance to exchange some questions with Scott Monty, head of social media at FORD Motor Company, about the company’s digital tactics, the social web and their web-strategy.

Q: Scott, FORD has launched the new Ford Focus. How much was the design and product development influenced by the “One Ford” strategy and your social media activities?

Scott Monty The design and development process was very much a One Ford process. German-based Gunnar Hermann has been the lead for the new global C-car platform. He worked with a team of global engineers, including people such as Jens Ludmann and Jim Hughes, who are the Focus lead engineers in Europe and North America, respectively. While we’ve seen a steady stream of customers in the U.S. showing interest in the current generation of the Focus in Europe, the process for developing a global car was well underway before we implemented our social media strategy.

Q: In which way is the One Ford strategy influenced by your team’s social web activities, or vice versa?

Scott Monty When Alan Mulally joined Ford in September 2006, he set the company on a course of brand consolidation and product planning that incorporated the One Ford vision. Our business plan and communications goals were set, and our social media strategy was developed to support both.

Picture above: FORD CEO Alan Mullaly and Social Media Scott Monty at Detroit motor show C-level social media jam.

Q: What were the biggest challenges when the Ford top-management decided to implement a social web-strategy?

Scott Monty Surprisingly few. There has been no resistance to change, and indeed, there’s been an incredible interest in this developing field by a wide range of our most senior executives. While we’ve enjoyed success in our social media activities over the last year (especially in the U.S.), the challenge ahead of us is how we effectively scale the operations and how we roll it out regionally.

Q: How important is it for companies to have all employees understanding and living the social web engagement of the company?

Scott Monty To the extent that a company is involved in social media and invites a culture of participation and transparency, it’s vitally important. But more than just understanding the tools and platforms; what we’re talking about is cultural change and a transformation in the way we do business. If we can help employees to understand that, we’ll be successful regardless of what social network our strategy is executed on.

Q: How important is web-strategy for the Ford business today?

Scott Monty It is vitally important, as that’s where our customers are. It’s where they do their research and it’s increasingly where they’re having conversations about our brand. We’ve dedicated 25% of our marketing budget to digital and social media – more than twice the rate of others in our industry. And when you consider that consumers trust people like themselves more than companies, it’s vital for us to open up ourselves to them and have them experience our vehicles and tell their networks about us.

Q: Why should companies have a (social) web-strategy in place in the upcoming decade?

Scott Monty The web – particularly the mobile web – is increasingly where people are spending their time. When they first stop to research your product is Google, everything you and your customers do on the web is trackable. And it’s where your company’s reputation is being built, every day.

Q: What advice would you give to companies that think about setting up their social web-strategy?

Scott Monty Listen first. Take time to discover what people are saying about your business and to understand the unwritten rules of the online communities in which your customers participate. Become a member of those sites or networks and spend time looking around. And when you decide it’s time to jump in, resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell. People are on these sites to talk with each other, not to be marketed to. Try to provide value. Be helpful. Ask for feedback. Give them unique and interesting material they can’t get elsewhere. Doing all of this over time will build trust and a deeper relationship with your customer base.

THX Scott for the time and your interesting insights!

About Scott Monty
Scott is head of social media for FORD Company. Or do you want his official title, then here you go: Global Digital & Multimedia Communications Manager. And he is a blogger. As a marketing and communications professional he has worked for a number of industries (healthcare, pharma, biotech, travel, automotive, tech, and communications), and numerous clients, from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. Today, he is a strategic advisor on all social media activities for FORD.

2010: Online ROI – a challenge for companies

The solution to the following question is complex: How should companies measure online ROI in future? In times of display, affiliate and search advertising the measure of success has been kept very simple. Page impressions, clicks, leads, sales – that was it. With the evolution of social media the topic of online measurement has become more complex.

In the Pre-Web 2.0 era, there was a formula that has put everything else into the shadows. It was based on the clic. Obviously still many CMOs see this as the crucial measurement factor of their online activities. The click was considered the basis of the digital marketing manifesto.

The formula of the previous online ROI went something like this…

Page impressions and clicks to convert click-through rate that generates leads and ultimately (hopefully) sales.

And this formula also corresponded to the value in the online marketing of cost-per-mile (CMP), cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-lead (CPL), cost-per-sale (CPO). Simple, clear, pragmatic.

Marketers were satisfied, the sales man less (mostly) due to inferior leads and associated fluctuating revenues. There was a lack of transparency. The management is considered to be overstretched. 2010 everything will be different.

In 2009, the main German association for publishers and buyers, the IVW, killed the power of the page impression, the visit is the ‘Golden Surfer’ from now on. An English study by the Online Publishers Association (OPA) is following suit and strengthens the effectiveness of the ’silent click’ and the value of the context.

Moreover Eyeblaster invents, and especially Dean Donaldson promotes this, the Dwell Time. Efficiency measurement of web activity becomes a challenge for companies. And if we take it to the top companies do need an eye-movement study to measure the time-based attention, the way we know it from the print era (similar to copy-test).

Another challenge is that there are numerous social media activities added, and here we are looking for a reliable measurement method to justify the expenses. In Germany the Association of Social Media and Social Media is quickly introducing a new currency: share of voice or share of buzz. A conceptually coherent model , but in practice is questionable in its feasibility, management and marketing relevance. A similar measure as the CTR won’t be found in the social media industry, probably still for a long time. Probably not even 2010…

Let’s illustrate the complexity of measuring social media ROI at a viral campaign, the buzz generated by social media coverage and results. Previously, the click was relevant. It was a unique short-term assessment without measurement of long-term effect. With the ended of the campaign the measurement time was over. Whether the click came from the desired target group of bookers ranked in it’s relevance secondary.

In a viral campaign, however, due to the target-transparency, the question of efficiency measurement is completely different. All these values are quite different in context and only win in their semantic and concluding statement its relevance for the advertiser.

Questions arise such as …

How much time commitment gives the user his social activities and the commitment to the company?
How do I rate detailed comments on blogs, micro-blogs or social networks?
How to evaluate an Re-Tweet in this context?
From whom are the comments and actions coming?
How does buzz spread via this person and to whom?
How relevant is the target audience about the distribution for the advertisers?
How to integrate ratings in the measurement methog on video- or evaluation platforms?
What about the statements that I can not even see, because a front door at Social Networks is obstructing my access to the results?

Without individual-subjective definion of measuring units, each company, every Social Media ROI measurement is worthless, and social media marketing measurement fortiori. The metric must be defined in the relevant context of the desired outcome best possible – in other words the individual needs of the corporate strategy or intention of each social media activity has to be adjusted from case to case. Increase in visits to the website? Generation of Fans or Followers? Couponing on a community? Knowledge on brand confessions obtained? Or actually generate online sales?

Each profile of an active social median, its social graph, in its sustainability and its recommended value of inside and outside “of his” social community has different weight. Determine where the true relevant measurement is the responsibility of the advertiser. At the Webcific I have called the new monetary views as “cost-per-commitment” to provide the relativity of the word in question and to make clear the relevance of the word, but for the future.

Commitment begins with the communication to customers and does not stop when clients order at the company’s shop. However, maintaining the commitment of campaign spending via email or traditional online activities still is essential. As customers loyalty runs outside the social media spheres, too. Defining commitment as a measure of social media may be based different on the company blog than on Facebook or Twitter.

A crucial factor in the social web is always forgotten: Traditional marketing campaigns have a beginning and an end. That’s when Social Web communication starts…

The CPI formula in times of social web might be …

Reach and engagement convert to social activities that lead to multipliers, and (probably generate) revenues from sales.

The future of online ROI measurement should be driven on the basis of how much communication output must a company deliver through a variety of social media, until the customers brand promise is gaining credibility and creates customer communications. This leads to commitment, which I have just referred to as “social activities” that need to be defined. They are the drivers of the talks for the multiplication of messages from the public relations, marketing and sales department.

Spot On!
Measuring the Social Web ROI is a long term process. Metrics from shares, posts, comments, ratings or Tweets replace the old click-metric. For the new metrics remain the web’s property, thanks to social search integration. Communication is dynamic and it may be that the pure bookmark result of yesterday, generates many social activities and conversations tomorrow.
Who dominates social communication that generates brand-vangelist peers (as I always like to call it). From anonymous platforms users become now fans, followers, blog readers and community members. They all have names that are transparent, a huge advantage of today’s web-talks. In the decisive moment, when they start participating in the discussing companies can find important multipliers of the message of a brand or a company, and therefore define important parameters. But companies should remember that communication can take place anywhere and adjust according to their web strategy. This modern weaving culture should incorporate engagement metrics or policies between sales and marketing. Otherwise, the effort of monitoring, measuring, analyzing is worth nothing, and will not meet the result of the challenge of 2010.

News Update – Best of the Day

Australian users show big interest in social web communication with companies via Twitter, YouTube and Facebook. Brett Waters talks about a recent study by RightNow and shows the benefit for customer service (customer care programs), generating interest and engagement and further aspects of recommendatiopn marketing and PR.
Some findings…
- 66% said they’d be happy for an organisation to contact them following a positive comment post
- 63% stated they would like to learn about discounts or special offers through social networking sites
- open discussion drives purchases: 70% were online and 30% were offline

Budgets lower? Jeremiah Owyang is focussing with his advocacy matrix on the goal of spreading marketing messages, and word of mouth, and viral. Good thoughts for your company to get the same output you had with big budget pockets.

Today, let’s have a look into the updated TheStrategyWeb YouTube channel for the latest updates on web-tv focussing strategy, web-strategy, social media, advertising, virals, funny commercials and so on. Very much appreciate any input, looing forward to it!

Study: Facebook is for women, Twitter less…

A recent study became of interest for me after having visited the Caveman show around Christmas. As we all know, and the comedy show makes this clear in a spectacular and funny way, men speak 2.000 and women 7.000 words on a normal day. Comparing this with the annual social media study by Shespeaks, it might sound obvious why Facebook is more for women, and Twitter the preferred social network for men.

Though having the proof with the study now, we might also argue that this is a prejudice. But let’s agree this is true for today…

The study has asked 1.559 women of the Shespeaks community which social network they are using. And, thinking about the above words, the result is not surprising. Facebook is the preferred platform for women: 95% of the surveyed women say that they have a Facebook profile. But only 38% are micro-blogging on Twitter. But why?

On Facebook women find what they want and need while not underlying any technical length restriction in communication (Sorry, Twitter is a 140 characters only platform…). Thus, social networking -at least for the moment- gives the proof for a long mystery. But there is more in the study from a business perspective!

Social media is becoming more and more a “strong driver for purchase decisions”. As the Shespeaks study states, with social networking women can satisfy their shopping behavior in a much better way. From a woman’s perspective, especially Facebook offers the right platform for brand commitment… and even more for recommendations. 80% have become fans of products and brands and 72% of the women said that they learn about a new product on Facebook. A dream-land for every marketer, right?!

Nevertheless, Twitter is the still very powerful for pr and marketing efforts – also if marketers want to reach women. Receiving coupon-codes is as popular on Twitter as it used to be (and still is) in the offline world. And when we look at the fact that 30% have purchased directly via Twitter or used a coupon-code therefore (27%), we might also argue that Twitter is a useful sales tool.

Study: Social Network access at work? Teens expect it!

Your company thinks about limiting or restricting the access of social networks during working time? You better have a second thought about it…

A recent study states that for the net generation social networking has become a crucial part of their business life. It is so central to their lifestyle that it becomes one of the main decision criteria when weighing job offers.

The Junior Achievement/Deloitte Teen Ethics Survey shows that 88% of teenagers use social networks on a daily basis. 58% of the teenagers surveyed said that they would consider the ability to access social networks when considering a job offer.

Business decision makers in companies should be aware of the fact that this might become a central question in recruiting talks. Teenagers will definitely make decision pro or contra a job on considerations about having the ability to access Facebook, Twitter, and the lot when applying for jobs.

Spot On!
Teenagers don’t use social networks to waste time witht heir peers, or even be unproductive. The main reasons for the use becomes clear when taking a close look at the results. 51% of the surveyed teens use social networks to help others. And 29% use the social benefit to create awareness for a cause. So, if you think of improving customer service, you should consider these facts and try to transfer the social abilities of the networks in order to build a stable customer communication world – with the net generation.

News Update – Best of the Day

A new report by Chitika Research states that BING users are more likely to click on ads than Google users. The CTR of users who come to the Chitika network via Bing is over 75% higher than those who come from Google – obviously all the results are based on Chitikah Research data. Nevertheless, Google dominates the search market with 84%, followed by Yahoo 7,4% and BING 5,75%.

A study presented at Harvard University by the “Society For New Communications Research” (SNCR) shows how the CEO and major decision makers get engagged with social media. Jeff Bullas summarizes the 30 key findings in this post. The top 5 business take-aways for me are the following…

- Professional decision-making is becoming more socia
- Professionals want to be collaborative in the decision-cycle
- LinkedIn, Facebook & Twitter are the leading social networks for professionals
- Professionals tend to belong to multiple social networks: ~50% in 3-5 social networks, 30% in 6 and 7% in more than 10 social networks
- Mobile Is Emerging as a Frequent Professional Networking Access Point with 94% using a PC and 44% using a Mobile

Some commercials are being released just at the right time wit the right funny approach… – Have you changed your tyres already? It’s winter-time…

The Evolution of the Engagement Economy

Talking about new trends on the social web, marketers always love the point of view when brands are involved. They love to negotiate, as I call it, on the “cost per engagement (cpe)” level. Businesses and their communication suppliers always try to get customers engaged in brands. Some years ago, this was difficult. Now, it seems easy. And this topic becomes even more relevant for future marketing strategies when you think about today’s engagement economy.

The engagement economy nowadays is doing things companies never thought would happen: There are people forwarding brand videos (which generate massive engagement), admitting to be emotionally involved in brands. We’ve got people publicly telling their peers how much they love products, services or companies. And then there are people discussing about products and how they would change these products and services in order to make them more profitable for the manufacturer. This is all happening right up to the point where people are basically saying “I am a brand maniac of…” – fantastic and unbelievable in one go, right?

So, if we take a look back and analyze this trend from a long-term web-strategic point of view, companies need to rethink the future of their web-marketing efforts as the social web transforms the value of processes in sales and marketing.

At an event last week a marketer I know quite well took me aside and asked: “Why are people not as engaged when clicking banners as they are when becoming fans or followers of brands on the social web?” And my first reaction was to give a shrug. But then I realized the huge potential of the thought and I said: “Gimme some days and I will try to blog an answer.”

In my view, a major part of the explanation to this phenomenon lies in the evolutionary process of the engagement economy and their brand commitment when people even want to become social VIPs or brand-vangelists and accept the ads from their favorite brands in their social graphs.

Emotions
The emotional-impact of banner advertising and of “social media engagement” is completely different – on those who ‘follow’ the people that click on traditional advertising (display or affiliate) and on those who become fans or followers.

Somebody who clicks a banner ad is not engaged in any kind of brand emotionality: This person is just interested in the offer or the message that grins in his face saying: “I am nice, ain’t I?!” So, why not take a glance at the offer (especially when coupons or incentives are involved) as it is a short-term sales boost via email or some other traditional online advertising format. The person who is clicking on a fan page wants to know more about the brand values, why people have become fans, who they are. This is someone who wants to give some kind of emotional kick back to the brand and the “engaged brand peers”. And just by becoming a fan, they give the brands more positive rewards than they probably realize – kind of like an ultimate pay back which has never existed in that form or to that extent before.

Action
People who participate in banner advertising come from the passive “lean-back economy”. Some experts are already wondering, if banners are dying. My answer is: No, as banners follow a different purpose than the social web marketing activity! The benefit for traditional online advertising is the click, resulting in the quick consumption of news and information. The engagement economy loves to lean forward and get in the driver seat of the brand communication and discussion. Emotionally motivated by the sweet feeling of competence, this engaged person argues about the good and bad of the brand values. When you look at Nespresso and Starbucks social media activities and other impressive examples on Facebook or Twitter, or you take the latest example of the IKEA Facebook campaign all what companies are doing is throwing some communication crums in. And the fans “crowd together” and pick them up with greedy brand enthusiasm. They give the companies and their peers input and feedback with comments, questions and by sharing the brand content and ideas. The emotions get their pay-off by little brand incentives and keep the wheels of engagement buzz turning.

Time
Think about how much time people spend with a brand when clicking on a banner versus being on a fan page. A banner is meant to save time – as does an offer – just by its intention and nature, as well as the message it carries. Check the offer and then be off as quick as possible. Is this the way a banner works? I think so. Rate this short interaction against the time of a brand experience on a fan page. People listen, learn and participate in the conversation about the brand, and come back to see how the communication proceeds. Not because a banner asks for their time to do so, but as the people want it themselves. The customer is the active part of the brand communication, not the company. The customer pays attention to the brand and donates “engagement time” as the new value or ROI for all brand communication efforts.

And then, why do they stay longer on a fan page? The answer is easy: Their “brand friends” are there. They feel to be in good company and this is what builds comfort, driven by a “warm feeling of friendship, networking and community”. You are not alone, you have something in common just by spending time on the same topic: a brand commitment.

Spot On!
The engagement economy is in charge of brand communication and brand commitment. The company still owns it but they are being managed by engaged brand fans. Now, my question to you: Is this true? What is your experience and your strategy when working with this new engagement economy?

News Update – Best of the Day

When companies evaluate social media, one of the question that comes up first is: How many social media platforms should we be using? My approach is always: Let’s have a look at your client structure and segmentation first and then see if your company has the appropriate company communication and participation skills, as well as obviously culture. Jeff Bulla has written an interesting social media road map for businesses about this topic.

All bloggers have their own secret of successful blogging. The founder of the successful-blog.com, Liz Strauss knows more than most of us and she gives some good information in an interview on Technorati.

Sometimes the web offers commercials which I find quite entertaining and funny but the question remains: Does it suit the brand’s values, especially when we are talking about a luxury watch brand?

Nächste Seite »