Neurological study: Bad websites causing ‘web-stress’

Bad designed websites and slow loading times are causing ‘web stress’ for internet users. This is the result of a new neurological study by CA in cooperation one of the leading customer experience and consultancy consulting firms Foviance. The study even shows that bad websites have a negative effect on the users health.

During the study, which was conducted at the Glasgow Caledonian University, volunteers (eight women and five men between the age of 25 and 42 years) were wired up to sophisticated neurological and physiological testing equipment (incl. an Electroencephalography cap) which was used to monitor brain wave activity. The volunteers carried out a series of everyday online tasks such as finding and buying a laptop PC and travel insurance. During the test the internet connection was slowed down to increase the stress factor.

With the generated data, CA and Foviance found the two most stressful points of the online sales cycle which caused a high level of ‘web-stress’: search and checkout. Although the volunteers completed the purchase, more than three quarters of customers will abandon the site in reality. And it took the volunteers up to a minute to recover from that ‘web stress’.

This result corresponds with CAs Web Stress Index study. In 2009 CA interviewed 2500 consumers. The key finding was that slow loading websites were a frustrating experience for 92% of the repondents. No wonder that volunteers in the experiment were leaving bad websites, or wanted to call the company’s hotline

“The results of this study sends out a clear message – businesses need to reduce ‘web stress’ and improve the online experience of their customers if they’re going to maximise returns from their web channel” (…) It’s not just about website design or internet connection speeds – the performance of a website is dependent on the performance of the web applications that support it. Businesses need an Application Performance Management (APM)** solution which not only provides real insight into how customers are experiencing their web applications, but will proactively manage the performance and availability of these applications. This translates into better customer service, improved brand loyalty and increased sales.”
Kobi Korsah, Director, EMEA Product Marketing, CA

And Foviance adds…

“Consumers have very high expectations of web applications and web sites – to be always available and instantly responsive. This experiment simulated the experience of underperforming web applications for our volunteers. The results show that when online expectations aren’t met, people quickly become agitated, confused and have to concentrate 50% more than normal. All these problems can be detected and prevented as long as businesses take a proactive approach to measuring the customer’s experience of web applications.”
Catriona Campbell, Director and Founder, Foviance and leading behavioural psychologist

Spot On!
In the summer of 2009, Akamai already revealed that 2 seconds is the new threshold of acceptability for eCommerce websites response times. The study showed that 40% of consumers won’t wait more than 3 seconds for a web page to load before leaving the site. This study by CA and Foviance makes this clear again: Corporations should have a close testing eye on the essential features (loading time for search and checkout) in order not to affect online shopping revenues. Especially if you bear in mind that online retail is predicted to grow to 320 billion EUR in 2011. More information can be found in this video on the CA study.

Das ist der Gipfel – Copycat als Trendsetter?

Was ist eine Business-Partnerschaft heute noch wert? Welche Nachhaltigkeit haben Partnerschaften zwischen Unternehmen im heutigen schnellebigen Wettbewerb um Kunden? Was interessieren manche Firmen ihre Business-Partner von gestern? Ein paar Fragen, die mir heute durch den Kopf gingen, als mir diese Anzeige eines Event-Veranstalters vor die Augen kam (siehe Foto unten links).

Aufgrund des Layouts und der textlichen Gestaltung fühlt sich der Interessent an das Trendforum (Flyer 2009, Foto rechts) erinnert. Die Veranstaltung Trendforum des Management Forums Starnberg in Zusammenarbeit mit der Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt würde in diesem Jahr sein 10-jähriges Jubiläum feiern. Da ich in den letzten beiden Jahren Partner des Trendforums war und deren Leitlinien der Veranstaltung kenne, habe ich natürlich der Anzeige Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt.

Doch es stellte sich heraus, daß es dabei gar nicht um das Trendforum geht, sondern um den Trendgipfel?!

Neupositionierung? Umorientierung? Umbenennung? Oder Präventivschlag? Offensichtlich Letzteres! Es ist eine Trend-Veranstaltung, die irgendwie als Copycat daherkommt. Ist das nun trendy?

Die Veranstaltungspromo gipfelt darin, daß eine der Veranstaltungspartner des ehemaligen Trendforums einen Alleingang macht: die Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt. Auch wenn es auf den ersten Blick so aussieht, als ob das Management Forum Starnberg weiterhin Partner ist – dem ist aber nicht so. Die Partnerschaft zwischen den Veranstaltern wurde letztes Jahr gekündigt seitens des Verlages. Jetzt ist klar warum.

Der ehemalige Businesspartner des Trendforums und dessen Ideengeber Frau Wiedmaier, Geschäftsführerin des Management Forum Starnberg, wurde nicht informiert. Der Titel wurde kurzerhand geändert. Die URL beihalten und “umgelenkt”. Das Layout und Design ist ebenfalls nahezu unverändert. Ein richtiges neues Logo ist nicht erkennbar. Einfach mal schnell bemerkt (siehe Post-It Kommentar rechts), daß der Event “Dieses Jahr im Juni” stattfindet. Obwohl es bisher noch gar keinen Trendgipfel gab?!

Das Trendforum wird es aber auch weiterhin geben – geplant ist es für den 23. und 24. November 2010.

Ist das nun der Gipfel oder ein cleverer Schachzug?

Spot On!
Das Konzept des Trendgipfels wendet sich an “Vorstände, Geschäftsführer, Marketing- und Vertriebsleiter”. Befassen die sich wirklich Marketing- und Vertriebsleiter mit den Trends der Zukunft? Oder sind das nicht eher die Unternehmesleitung, strategische Planungstellen und Trend- und Innovations-Management, die bisher durch das Trendforum addressiert wurden?

Manchmal wundert man sich über die Strategien der führenden deutschen Verlagswelt. Und auch über deren “Sateliten-Business”, welches das Unternehmens als Trendsetter erscheinen lassen soll. Und man frägt sich, welches Grundverständnis heutigen Business-Partnerschaften zugrunde liegt.

Is e-meeting a trend or the future?

While some signs suggest the economy is stabilizing and the global recession might find an ending, the majority of business travel managers will be looking for alternatives to travel that can be enabled by technology in the future.

A recent survey “2010 Corporate-Travel Spend Plans & Tactics,” conducted by Kotler Marketing Group, in conjunction with the Association of Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE) provides a detailed analysis of enterprise travel spend plans versus the growing use of electronic alternatives (e.g. web- and video-conferencing) to offset travel.

- 55% of respondents would rely on electronic alternatives more in the future in order to reduce travel expenses.
- More than 40% said their organizations are replacing sales-related travel with conferencing in coming years.
- However, web and video conferencing were not rated as “usually effective” means in accomplishing the goals of their meetings.

Another interesting result of a study by the Palm Springs Desert Resort Communities Convention and Visitors Authority shows that desert hotels lost an estimated $30 million in convention and meetings travel from late 2008 through May.

Now, we might argue and ask the question if executives refrain from going on planes the way they did in the past. And we might ask if spending money for big conferences is ‘out’. So, will department kick-offs with nice trips to the US (or some other interesting places worldwide) be a thing of the past in some years?

Spot On!
Some years ago, one of my partners said: “Can I insert my Miles&More card in our new video conferencing system?” What sounds funny to us has more impact than most of top management members might think. Traveling is a personality statement for a lot of managers. It is also about gestures, mimic, sensual perception, hand-shaking and all that which makes more impression on our business contacts and our deals than some stockholders might think when looking at their shareholder value. Meaning, companies will face a conflict in terms of cost savings and probably embrace the trend of the new technology. Nevertheless, businesses will be trying out alternatives to traveling for meetings with web- or video conferencing. In my opinion meetings need to happen in real life more frequently than online.

Do meetings not have a deeper meaning for business? What is your perception about the effectiveness of these new meeting technologies as travel replacements?

Social Web: “When you decide to jump in, resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell.” – Interviewing Scott Monty

At the Detroit motor show 2010 Ford executives from around the world spent one entire day engaging with Ford Fans and online influencers on social web platforms like Twitter, Facebook, BlogTalkRadio, CoverItLive, and more.

TheStrategyWeb was given the chance to exchange some questions with Scott Monty, head of social media at FORD Motor Company, about the company’s digital tactics, the social web and their web-strategy.

Q: Scott, FORD has launched the new Ford Focus. How much was the design and product development influenced by the “One Ford” strategy and your social media activities?

Scott Monty The design and development process was very much a One Ford process. German-based Gunnar Hermann has been the lead for the new global C-car platform. He worked with a team of global engineers, including people such as Jens Ludmann and Jim Hughes, who are the Focus lead engineers in Europe and North America, respectively. While we’ve seen a steady stream of customers in the U.S. showing interest in the current generation of the Focus in Europe, the process for developing a global car was well underway before we implemented our social media strategy.

Q: In which way is the One Ford strategy influenced by your team’s social web activities, or vice versa?

Scott Monty When Alan Mulally joined Ford in September 2006, he set the company on a course of brand consolidation and product planning that incorporated the One Ford vision. Our business plan and communications goals were set, and our social media strategy was developed to support both.

Picture above: FORD CEO Alan Mullaly and Social Media Scott Monty at Detroit motor show C-level social media jam.

Q: What were the biggest challenges when the Ford top-management decided to implement a social web-strategy?

Scott Monty Surprisingly few. There has been no resistance to change, and indeed, there’s been an incredible interest in this developing field by a wide range of our most senior executives. While we’ve enjoyed success in our social media activities over the last year (especially in the U.S.), the challenge ahead of us is how we effectively scale the operations and how we roll it out regionally.

Q: How important is it for companies to have all employees understanding and living the social web engagement of the company?

Scott Monty To the extent that a company is involved in social media and invites a culture of participation and transparency, it’s vitally important. But more than just understanding the tools and platforms; what we’re talking about is cultural change and a transformation in the way we do business. If we can help employees to understand that, we’ll be successful regardless of what social network our strategy is executed on.

Q: How important is web-strategy for the Ford business today?

Scott Monty It is vitally important, as that’s where our customers are. It’s where they do their research and it’s increasingly where they’re having conversations about our brand. We’ve dedicated 25% of our marketing budget to digital and social media – more than twice the rate of others in our industry. And when you consider that consumers trust people like themselves more than companies, it’s vital for us to open up ourselves to them and have them experience our vehicles and tell their networks about us.

Q: Why should companies have a (social) web-strategy in place in the upcoming decade?

Scott Monty The web – particularly the mobile web – is increasingly where people are spending their time. When they first stop to research your product is Google, everything you and your customers do on the web is trackable. And it’s where your company’s reputation is being built, every day.

Q: What advice would you give to companies that think about setting up their social web-strategy?

Scott Monty Listen first. Take time to discover what people are saying about your business and to understand the unwritten rules of the online communities in which your customers participate. Become a member of those sites or networks and spend time looking around. And when you decide it’s time to jump in, resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell. People are on these sites to talk with each other, not to be marketed to. Try to provide value. Be helpful. Ask for feedback. Give them unique and interesting material they can’t get elsewhere. Doing all of this over time will build trust and a deeper relationship with your customer base.

THX Scott for the time and your interesting insights!

About Scott Monty
Scott is head of social media for FORD Company. Or do you want his official title, then here you go: Global Digital & Multimedia Communications Manager. And he is a blogger. As a marketing and communications professional he has worked for a number of industries (healthcare, pharma, biotech, travel, automotive, tech, and communications), and numerous clients, from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. Today, he is a strategic advisor on all social media activities for FORD.

Web 2.0 und Unternehmensführung: Diskussion zum Status 2010

Für die Süddeutsche Zeitung 1,90 EUR zu investieren, ist heutzutage für so manchen Blogger ungewöhnlich. Für mich war es das gestern nicht. Stand da doch einiges über Web 2.0 Strategien und die aktuelle Zukunft des Web zu lesen: vom Streit zwischen Google und China, über die Safttante sowie diversen mit ihrem Unternehmensblog zusammengebrachten Hintergründen und taktischen Anregungen zu Erfahrungen für Unternehmen.

Die Zukunftsvisionen für Unternehmen wurden mal wieder von Don Tapscott, Web-Berater und Autor der Bücher Wikinomics und Grow up digital, in einem Interview zum Ausdruck gebracht. Erst kürzlich hatte er den Titel seines neuen Buches “Rebuilding the world” über sein Blog gesucht, sprich: Kollaboration mit seiner Community hat ihm bei der Titelfindung geholfen.

Das Interview möchte ich als Ansporn zur Diskussion Web 2.0 in der Unternehmensführung nehmen. Tapscott regt Unternehmen an, die Web 2.0 Grundprinzipien offene Diskussion, transparenteres Innovationsmanagement und zukunftsfähige Kollaboration verstärkt einzusetzen und zu fördern. Schließlich könne man mit deratigen Netzwerkmodellen “sein Geschäft ausbauen”.

Auf die Frage ‘Warum macht es dann nicht jeder?’ entgegnet Tapscott:

“Weil eingefahrene Gewohnheiten schwer zu ändern sind. Vor 30 Jahren sagten Kritiker, Manager werden nie internetfähige Computer nutzen – weil sie nicht selbst tippen werden. Können Sie sich das vorstellen? Der gesamte Wechsel zur Internetgesellschaft wurde mit diesem einen Argument in Frage gestellt. Und genauso ist es heute. Eine Web2.0-Kultur würde die Machtverhältnisse in Firmen von grundauf verändern. Daran haben viele Unternehmensführer überhaupt kein Interesse.”

Moment!? Ist das wirklich heute noch so? Sind Unternehmensführer wirklich so internet-resistent? Können sich Unternehmensführer das noch leisten in der Zukunft? Ändern sich Machtverhältnisse in Euren Augen? Was wird sich ändern? Wird es weiterhin 30 Jahre dauren, bis Kollaboration zwischen konkurrierenden Unternehmen stattfindet.

Es gibt so viele Social Media und Social Web Berater neben Don Tapscott (vielleicht noch nicht so bekannt wie er, ok…). Jeder trägt einen gewissenen Erfahrungsschatz aus seiner Beratung von Unternehmen zu dem Thema. Teilt ihn mit uns. Lasst uns die Diskussion führen und alle davon profitieren.

2010: Online ROI – a challenge for companies

The solution to the following question is complex: How should companies measure online ROI in future? In times of display, affiliate and search advertising the measure of success has been kept very simple. Page impressions, clicks, leads, sales – that was it. With the evolution of social media the topic of online measurement has become more complex.

In the Pre-Web 2.0 era, there was a formula that has put everything else into the shadows. It was based on the clic. Obviously still many CMOs see this as the crucial measurement factor of their online activities. The click was considered the basis of the digital marketing manifesto.

The formula of the previous online ROI went something like this…

Page impressions and clicks to convert click-through rate that generates leads and ultimately (hopefully) sales.

And this formula also corresponded to the value in the online marketing of cost-per-mile (CMP), cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-lead (CPL), cost-per-sale (CPO). Simple, clear, pragmatic.

Marketers were satisfied, the sales man less (mostly) due to inferior leads and associated fluctuating revenues. There was a lack of transparency. The management is considered to be overstretched. 2010 everything will be different.

In 2009, the main German association for publishers and buyers, the IVW, killed the power of the page impression, the visit is the ‘Golden Surfer’ from now on. An English study by the Online Publishers Association (OPA) is following suit and strengthens the effectiveness of the ’silent click’ and the value of the context.

Moreover Eyeblaster invents, and especially Dean Donaldson promotes this, the Dwell Time. Efficiency measurement of web activity becomes a challenge for companies. And if we take it to the top companies do need an eye-movement study to measure the time-based attention, the way we know it from the print era (similar to copy-test).

Another challenge is that there are numerous social media activities added, and here we are looking for a reliable measurement method to justify the expenses. In Germany the Association of Social Media and Social Media is quickly introducing a new currency: share of voice or share of buzz. A conceptually coherent model , but in practice is questionable in its feasibility, management and marketing relevance. A similar measure as the CTR won’t be found in the social media industry, probably still for a long time. Probably not even 2010…

Let’s illustrate the complexity of measuring social media ROI at a viral campaign, the buzz generated by social media coverage and results. Previously, the click was relevant. It was a unique short-term assessment without measurement of long-term effect. With the ended of the campaign the measurement time was over. Whether the click came from the desired target group of bookers ranked in it’s relevance secondary.

In a viral campaign, however, due to the target-transparency, the question of efficiency measurement is completely different. All these values are quite different in context and only win in their semantic and concluding statement its relevance for the advertiser.

Questions arise such as …

How much time commitment gives the user his social activities and the commitment to the company?
How do I rate detailed comments on blogs, micro-blogs or social networks?
How to evaluate an Re-Tweet in this context?
From whom are the comments and actions coming?
How does buzz spread via this person and to whom?
How relevant is the target audience about the distribution for the advertisers?
How to integrate ratings in the measurement methog on video- or evaluation platforms?
What about the statements that I can not even see, because a front door at Social Networks is obstructing my access to the results?

Without individual-subjective definion of measuring units, each company, every Social Media ROI measurement is worthless, and social media marketing measurement fortiori. The metric must be defined in the relevant context of the desired outcome best possible – in other words the individual needs of the corporate strategy or intention of each social media activity has to be adjusted from case to case. Increase in visits to the website? Generation of Fans or Followers? Couponing on a community? Knowledge on brand confessions obtained? Or actually generate online sales?

Each profile of an active social median, its social graph, in its sustainability and its recommended value of inside and outside “of his” social community has different weight. Determine where the true relevant measurement is the responsibility of the advertiser. At the Webcific I have called the new monetary views as “cost-per-commitment” to provide the relativity of the word in question and to make clear the relevance of the word, but for the future.

Commitment begins with the communication to customers and does not stop when clients order at the company’s shop. However, maintaining the commitment of campaign spending via email or traditional online activities still is essential. As customers loyalty runs outside the social media spheres, too. Defining commitment as a measure of social media may be based different on the company blog than on Facebook or Twitter.

A crucial factor in the social web is always forgotten: Traditional marketing campaigns have a beginning and an end. That’s when Social Web communication starts…

The CPI formula in times of social web might be …

Reach and engagement convert to social activities that lead to multipliers, and (probably generate) revenues from sales.

The future of online ROI measurement should be driven on the basis of how much communication output must a company deliver through a variety of social media, until the customers brand promise is gaining credibility and creates customer communications. This leads to commitment, which I have just referred to as “social activities” that need to be defined. They are the drivers of the talks for the multiplication of messages from the public relations, marketing and sales department.

Spot On!
Measuring the Social Web ROI is a long term process. Metrics from shares, posts, comments, ratings or Tweets replace the old click-metric. For the new metrics remain the web’s property, thanks to social search integration. Communication is dynamic and it may be that the pure bookmark result of yesterday, generates many social activities and conversations tomorrow.
Who dominates social communication that generates brand-vangelist peers (as I always like to call it). From anonymous platforms users become now fans, followers, blog readers and community members. They all have names that are transparent, a huge advantage of today’s web-talks. In the decisive moment, when they start participating in the discussing companies can find important multipliers of the message of a brand or a company, and therefore define important parameters. But companies should remember that communication can take place anywhere and adjust according to their web strategy. This modern weaving culture should incorporate engagement metrics or policies between sales and marketing. Otherwise, the effort of monitoring, measuring, analyzing is worth nothing, and will not meet the result of the challenge of 2010.

Social Web: Biermarken werden zur digitalen Kunstbar

Als Claudia Sommer vor ein paar Monaten schrieb, Twitter sei “wie eine Kneipe”, da hat sie definitiv weniger an Biermarken gedacht als vielmehr die Tatsache, wie sich der Mensch in Twitter bewegt und kommuniziert. Als ich am Wochenende das aktuelle GQ in der Hand hielt, mußte ich wieder an ihr Zitat denken. Vor mir eröffnete sich eine relativ neue Marketing-Taktik der Biermarken Veltins und Becks Gold. Sie bewarben mit Printakampagnen ausschließlich ihre Social Media Aktivitäten – und nicht mehr die klassische Homepage oder sonstige Kontaktoptionen wie Email oder das Service-Telefon. Und im Vordergrund der Kampagne stand nicht Fussball, wie zu vermuten wäre. Nein. Kunst und Kultur stehen im Mittelpunkt…

Becks und die urbanen Erfahrungen
Vor allem die Marke Becks Gold zeigt sich im Social Web äußerst aktiv, wie das Advertorial klar macht. Mit zahlreichen Zugangspunkten im Social Web initiiert man Gespräche wie in einer digitalen Kunstbar. Den Startschuss hat dabei -laut der Anzeige- ein Offline-Event gegeben, was ich angesichts meines Leitspruches (Connecting Online and Offline) als einen sehr cleveren Schachzug sehe. Unter dem Claim Beck’s Gold Urban Experiences hat man Ende Oktober in Berlin die Ära des Social Web mit einer extravaganten Laufsteg-Veranstaltung aufleben lassen: originell, stylisch und hochwertig – ganz getreu dem hochwertigen Image.

Den eingeleiteten Prozess des Erforschens modernen Stadtlebens will man nun online weiterleben lassen. Inhaltlich beschäftigt sich die soziale Kommunikation mit Kunst, Mode, Design und Film. Die Auftritte mittels Blog, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook bieten soziale Austausch-Plattformen und liefern die Visualisierung der Veranstaltungen und Diskussionen für Fans und Follower. Der Dialog wurde vorwiegend mittels klassischen Gewinnspielen angestoßen. Es zeigt sich bei genauem Hinsehen, daß Moderation der Community auch bei erfolgreichen Brands im Social Web eine wichtige Komponente bleibt.

Fazit: Eine aufwendige Social Marketing Idee, die interessant und ansprechend konzipiert ist. Offensichtlich begeistert sie auch, wenn man sich die zahlreichen Fans ansieht. Ein guter Start, der allerdings auch langfristig ein volles Fass an Inspiration bieten muß und cleveres Social Media Promotion Management erfordert, wenn man dem hochwertigen Image treu bleiben will. Ein wenig erinnert alles an das Social Web Konzept von Adidas UrbanArtGuide, das es sogar schon als mobile iPhone App gibt. Aber das sein nur am Rande erwähnt…

Veltins geht an die Facebook-Theke
Veltins wechselt von klassischen VIP-Testimonials zu sozialer Kommunikation von und mit Kunden. Und für diesen Wechsel hat Veltins sich offensichtlich viel Zeit genommen. So war die Trennung von Assauer und Thomalla zu Jahresanfang für Veltins vermutlich ein nun willkommenes Ereignis – aus Werbesicht. Auch wenn die beiden über Jahre für witzige und Rollen-vertauschte Beziehungswerbung. Frau war Frau, Mann war Mann und doch irgendwie nicht. Frau durfte mal schnell behaupten, Bier sei aus. Mann durfte die leckere Frau für eine kühles Blondes liegen lassen. Die Videos der Biermarke standen für humoristische Gleichberechtigung und Beziehungsfrohsinn – und belebten den Social Talk der Offlinewelt.

Diesen menschlichen Werbetouch will Veltins nun mit Social Media Aktivitäten weiterführen. Unter dem Motto ‘Moderne Braukunst’ stellt die neue Print-Werbung -neben dem Gewinn des reddot design awards- vor allem den Facebook Auftritt in den Mittelpunkt, der mit einem fetten Schriftzug beworben wird. Nein, keine weiteren Kontaktoptionen. Ja, das ist wahrlich neu und immer mehr im Trend – gerade bei Marken, die letztendlich über Partner vertrieben werden. Da die Partner den unmittelbaren Feedback-Kanal zum Hersteller nicht so oft nutzen, eröffnet die Marke mit dem Social Web jetzt einfach eine Reihe digitaler Kunstbars und kommt so mit den Konsumenten direkt ins Gespräch.

Fazit: Veltins setzt offensichtlich voll auf Facebook – und ebenfalls auf den künstlerischen Urban Touch. Die Kampagne linkt auf ein Gewinnspiel für hochwertige Kunstdrucke (inklusive Lead-Generierung). Auch die Kommunikation innerhalb der Page geht vorwiegend um Modern Art und Design. YouTube langt man vermutlich nicht an, da die bisherige TV-Werbung vermutlich immernoch der Marke ihren Dienst erweist. Interessanterweise gehört der gleichnamigeTwitter Account ‘Veltins’ offensichtlich einer Privatperson, die zwar beachtlich viel über Bier spricht, aber nicht über eine Biermarke: Veltins. Man kann verstehen, wenn man bei Twitter als Marke das Ziel verfehlt, aber den “branded account” sollte man sich schon organisieren.

Spot On!
Veltins und Becks Gold öffnen also die digitale Kunstbar. Und die anderen? Es gibt zahlreiche weitere große Biermarken, die noch nicht auf die Social Web Welt setzen. So fehlen beispielsweise offizielle Varianten von Warsteiner, Krombacher, Radeberger oder Paulaner. Ohne Zutun der Marken gibt es dennoch zahlreiche sozial-engagierte Gruppen von Fans, die offensichtlich die offizielle Variante zur Kommunikation und dem Bekenntnis zur Marke nicht benötigen. Stellt sich also die Frage, ob die obigen Brauereien die Kontrolle lenken wollen, oder es um das Mißverständnis geht, daß Social Media kein Werbemedium ist.

Welche Variante findet ihr denn besser? Die offizielle Page oder der Ansatz einer selbst-organisierten Fangruppe?

2010: Social media budgets increase – but where to find resources?

The good news? Budgets for social media will increase. The bad news? Companies are struggling to find the time and resources to handle their activity, according to the “Social Media and Online PR Report” by Econsultancy and bigmouthmedia.

The research aimed at finding out how companies are using online PR tactics and social media sites (i.e. Facebook and Twitter) for marketing and customer service. The result of the survey shows that the majority of companies (86%) plan to spend more budgets on social media next year 2010 – 13% are not changing their budgets and will keep the same level of spendings.

The biggest challenge for companies is resources: 54% see this as a significant problem. And 90% say it is more time-consuming internally than last year. The named benefit is remarkable: One-fourth of companies found they have achieved “real, tangible value” from social media; 60% say they have bained “some benefit but nothing concrete.”

“The reality is that most businesses understand how to listen, what to measure and where to engage but are struggling to define the value of engagement and reputation in social spaces,” said Michelle Goodall, Econsultancy’s social media and online PR consultant.

One of this companies is definitely Dell. They just announced to have sold PCs, accessories and software for 6,5 million USD via Twitter.

Some Twitter results…
- 78% use Twitter as a social media tactic and 74% of agency respondents
- 65% social network profile creatio n and management
- 62% use the micro-blogging site for publicizing new content
- 54% use the channel for marketing
- 47% for brand monitoring

Spot On!
Only 27% take the advantage of using Twitter as a customer service (and 25% as a customer feedback) tool for reacting to issues and inquiries. And when 31% see “tremendous opportunities” available in using Twitter for customer contact, but only half reporting that their companies are “open-minded but not fully convinced about the value to the business”, it tells the story: We all need to create results and cases in order to provide the positive proof. Especially, when 7% say their organization feels that Twitter is over-hyped and a fad.

Social Media and Advertising – how to explain an antithesis to C-levels?

Facing the pure intention of social media versus advertising, we have to admit that we are talking about an antithesis – no matter if you can book advertising on a social networks or not. Social Media is conversations while advertising is the monologue from company to customer. And in between lies some undefined (or shall we say unqualified) customer dialogue that we have been through for years of online advertising.

So, how can we explain this type of modern ‘customer engagement setting’ to C-level executives? How can we bring these two anti-poles together? What could have been a better idea than asking to the people that have been through this process of explaining, evaluating and engaging C-levels from both sides – platform owners and brand companies.

Maybe you want to listen to their thoughts…

Blake Chandlee, vice president and commercial director EMEA, Facebook (recorded after the DMEXCO panel ’social media and advertising’) – sees the biggest challenges in the evolution from their traditional management roles of strategy and investement thinking towards a new business world called ’social networking’.

Tony Douglas, Innovation Manager, BMW Group – advices to make senior management aware of the potential that social media offers, and knows off the trial-and-error process companies might be going through.

“Firstly you have to get the channels on the agenda that means you have to convince/demonstrate to senior management that the channels are relevant i.e. they are a valuable addition to the marketing communication mix. Just because you have a new channel does not mean you have more budget so you have to prove that this “new” channel is better than some “old” one only then will you get a shift in budget.

Social media and “advertising” are two very odd bed fellows…you cannot do a traditional banner campaign in social media it does not work you need to target and get your context and content right. “Targeting” is also a new science so you have to educate the C-level on what this is. The content is not one size fits all as is often the case with ATL content….here we are talking a mass of niches. However the really tough bit you have to be social now that can be a real challenge. I think it’s fair to say that not many professional marketers have been schooled in how to be social (in marketing). This is new ground for many marketers and brands and like all new stuff it takes time to adapt and learn.

So start early, start small, learn by doing and adapt quickly and if you demonstrate success and a greater return on investment you’ll find those obstacles and challenges will disappear. They are disappearing in the BMW Group.”

Tim Meier, Brand Manager, Bacardi – focuses on the customer dialogue as the main point for his argumentation.

“Generally speaking, it is necessary to enhance top management understanding of social media as a qualitative target group related dialogue communication opportunity. Any figures to measure social media ROI need to be accompanied by the level of qualitative consumer references. In how far are you able to define the GRP level of a positive brand related post from a celebrity/opinion leader? Social Media will certainly emancipate as an equal part of the marketing mix to support future brand campaigns on the image level. Nevertheless you´ll be rewarded with additional coverage if you´re doing a good job and offer a consumer relevant content.”

Spot On!
It would be interesting to get some more views on how we can help making C-levels understand the values of social media quicker, better or more accurate. If we don’t do it, your customers might become the teachers of modern successful customer engagement – but this might be painful for your companies brand. So maybe you and your company are in the same process of evaluating social media and advertising. Wanna share your knowledge with us…

Looking forward to it.

News Update – Best of the Day

A annual study by Financial Times and Doremus Decision Dynamics among 470 senior executives indicates, that these executives are loosing trust in service providers. The top 5 negatives are…

Advertising and communications -10%
Commercial banks -31%
Investment banks -29%
Management consulting -17%
Insurance -15%

A quite new futuristic tool for media planning seems to be ‘psycho-graphic targeting’. Well, at least this new tool by Peerset -well explained by ReadWriteWeb- sounds very interesting. Peerset’s targeting algorithm uses keywords and meta data from online profiles and matches them with relevant information. Read more…

Ruffles knows what men are thinking… and thus, they have produced a great commercial. And guess what gets us away from think of something else than… well you know it.

Nächste Seite »