LinkedIn – The importance of using invitation texts

In the last months, all social business networkers on LinkedIn have shared the same experience. They have received different invitations from people all over the world with the following invitation text…

“I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Surname Name”

Short, targeting, and easy to understand – for everybody all over the world. Hmmmm….?!

This raises some questions in my head on the importance of invitation texts. And I would appreciate your views and get some feedback of people who also use LinkedIn for social business networking.

Personalization
Is it ok to use the standardized version of the invitation text by LinkedIn? We are all marketers and we know that personalization is key. So, isn’t it better to re-phrase the standardized text version and write a short PERSONAL message?

Curiosity
If somebody is not writing a personal message, is it a sign that this person wants me to respond to him/her, and ask WHY this person wants me in his/her business social network? Even think about the impact on playing a psychological game on hierarchy thinking. Or is it just the peek a boo effect? Or is it just a hunters and collectors business?

Test
If somebody leaves the standardized personal message, the contacted person might think this is a TEST on his/her social networking capabilities. So, companies might check how serious job applicants take social networking, how quick potential employees respond, or how much somebody is engaged in social media in general. Or just to test if this person understands effective lead generation?

Spot On!
Should not LinkedIn change its service? The one who is contacted cannot see what the contacting person has ticked in the box in terms of the business relationship, he or she is referring to.

What is your view and experience on invitations by social networks – especially from a business perspective.

Lead Generation: Combination of social web tools and email marketing is powerful and cost-effective

All marketers know how much effort and tactical knowledge it needs to generate high quality leads. And everybody tries to find the silver bullet in order not to push too much budgets the wrong way. Finding the right tactics becomes more complex with the rise and importance of the social web.

An annual report by Hubspot “2010 State of Inbound Marketing” has asked 231 marketers, and shows that pull marketing tactics like blogging, search and social media generate cheaper leads than traditional outbound efforts. If companies devote at least one-half of their budget to inbound marketing like social web activities -compared to the same outbound marketing budget spending- they can save up to 60%.

Some more interesting findings…
- The average cost per lead from inbound marketing was significantly less.

- The rate of customer acquisition declines steadily with the rate of blog posting.
- Direct mail is still most cost-effective among outbound strategies. Only 37% generated leads for less than average.
- Social Networking is key! Over 40% of customers using Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook and company blogs have generated a customer from that channel
- Businesses rated every inbound channel more important than any outbound channel for lead generation.
- B2B customer acquisition with LinkedIn was most effective. B2C businesses did best with Facebook (7 out of 10 found a new customer using social networks).

Spot On!
Tactics that are not cost-effective are not supported with spending any longer by companies, concludes the report. Inbound tactics get more value share of general lead generation budgets, outbound tactics loose money. It is not surprising that email marketing is still popular as a tactic. The Merkle report “View from the Social Inbox” states that social media hasn’t replaced traditional e-mail among users. 71% of respondents are spending 20 minutes or more weekly with traditional email – 42% of social networkers check their email account four or more times a day.

So, the combination of email marketing and social web tactics seems to be powerful and cost-effective for lead generation.

Do you agree?

News Update – Best of the Day

The Fortune 500’s companies embrace the social web more and more. The use of web 2.0 tools continues to increase. The fastest growing tool was Twitter in 2009. This found the study “The Fortune 500 and Social Media: A Longitudinal Study of Blogging and Twitter Usage by America’s Largest Companies”.

The key findings:

- 22% of the 2009 Fortune 500 have a public-facing corporate blog.
- 86% of these blogs link directly to a corporate twitter account – more Fortune 500 corporations have Twitter accounts, but do not link directly from their blogs.
- 35% have active Twitter accounts (post within the past thirty days)
- 50% of the top 100 companies have a Twitter account.
- 80% post regularly on their Twitter accounts. the number one, Exxon Mobil, does not have a Twitter account.
- The insurance industry has the most Twitter accounts (13).
- 19% is podcasting
- 31% integrate online video into their blog sites

Now, compare the data with the top 100 companies social web strategies The new Burson-Marsteller Fortune Global 100 Social Media study gives some insights and shows that the use of Twitter goes up. It is the top social media platform of choice among the Fortune Global 100.
- 65% of the largest 100 international companies have active Twitter accounts
- 54% have a Facebook fan page
- 50% have a YouTube channel
- 33% have corporate blogs.
Interesting for me to see is that only 20% make use of all four platforms to engage their customers or business partners. And there are also regional differences: Companies in the United States and Europe are more likely to use Twitter or Facebook than corporate blogs. Businesses in Asia-Pacific are more likely to utilize corporate blogs than social networks.

The new MINI Countryman just launched thneir first exclusive commercial video. The slogan for their new car: Life is out there. Go live it. And once you have seen the spot you know what mmakes the difference between offline and online.

Augmented Reality – the future of customer service?

The customer service world around us is changing with the social web, new technologies, and especially mobile apps. The question is how much this is effecting our perspective of the real offline world around us. A new technology is evolving that is beginning to connect the offline and the virtual world from a customer perspective as it will offer some new form of customer service. The term is Augmented Reality (AR).

It is a technology that brings your visual experience and information from the web or networks together, and by doing this enriches daily situations with relevant data from the web – and in more and more cases the information provided will come from the user.

The competition for users and companies has already begun. We have augmented reality browsers like Layar, explaining us instantly which famous buildings are surrounding us. Or, another AR browser named Wikitude that starts to become one of the most-wanted AR browser apps (not only for iPhone users) and gets nominated for one award after another. With wikitude.me shops and service providers of all sorts can already use this cool service to make themselves visible in the offline world by geo-tagging their office or location with simple online entries. If somebody is new in a city, this person can find a laundry or the next wine shop much easier in the future – just by using an AR browser app.

There are products like T-shirts projecting interactive games with AR. Digital cosmetic mirrors where women in cosmetic shops can see in real-time what a new eye-liner or make-up is looking good at them without testing it in reality. Adidas will launch a series of shoes, each printed with an AR code on the tongue which give you access to an interactive game that changes on a montly basis. Is this the customer service of the future?

Now, just imagine what this technology could do for customer service in the future. Wouldn’t it be a positive effect when we get immediate feedback on health information about the food and drinks we consume?

The following short film, called Augmented (Hyper)Reality, shows us a world some time ahead, where augmented reality is part of our daily offline life. We see what the actor sees, from his own perspective, and get to know the oppotunities that AR might offer to our daily life. OK, if we agree to getting networked completely…

The interesting acknowledgement for companies will be the advertising part of the film – although in some way it might be shocking…

Spot On!
The complete overkill seems to be the massive sea of logos flooding our sight in the beginning. Although the above examples might seem an exaggerated view of a futuristic branding scenario, it gives some idea on how the world might change customer care in the future. And you never know if this will be really happening, or not. Today, this all might sound strange to us but just think about how common the use of artifical medical help is for us, or how often we use the navigation system in cars today.

And then, think about the options when combining location based advertising with augmented reality. This opens a complete new world of customer care…

Don’t you think?

Moms access point for engagement? – Social Networks!

If your company sells children (car) seats, diapers, baby buggies or lipstick, when it comes to engaging at-home moms you may think about social networks. At least two recent reports from the Retail Advertising and Marketing Association (RAMA) conducted by BIGresearch as well as another one conducted by Lucid Marketing and analyst Lisa Finn in the US make clear that moms are more likely to be on Facebook, MySpace or Twitter than other moms.

Moms log on almost daily
And moms are using social networks quite often. A Lucid Marketing study states that 80% of Facebooking moms log in at least daily. Even more, 30% of the responding moms login more than five times each day. Also mobile logins are quite popular: About 40% login from smartphones and computers.

The future seems to belong to Facebook. 90% of the moms say the Facebook benefit is that its easy contacting friends/family. 26% mention they like the apps (games and quizzes).

Social web for at-home moms important
- 60% more likely to use Facebook
- 42% more likely to use MySpace
- 16% more likely to use Twitter
- 15% maintain their own blogs

“Retailers who aren’t engaging customers through social media could be missing the boat” (…) “Twitter, Facebook and blogs are becoming increasingly popular with moms as they search for coupons or deals and keep in touch with loved ones. The web provides efficient, convenient ways for brands to stay in front of their most loyal shoppers and attract new ones.”
Mike Gatti, Executive Director, RAMA

Spot on!
Now, the most interesting part for marketers: 64% like ads (or feeling neutral about) on Facebook, says the Lucid Marketing study. Meaning, Facebooking moms are apparently open to get in touch with brands and marketers – if they take their wants and needs into account. The ’social moms’ are getting engaged when they search for exclusive deals (i.e. coupons and discounts). Apart from that, these studies indicate that companies addressing moms could replace old loyalty programs. I am sure, this is a great opportunity. But don’t forget to provide sustainable conversation – moms hate it not to be taken serious in their job at-home.

News Update – Best of the Day

How much value has social networking for young-people? While a study shows the huge amount of time American children spend on the web, a new study by the University of Virginia shows the benefit of social networking for the well-adjusted.

”The best-adjusted young people were far more likely to use social media as an extension of their positive friendships,” said Assistant Professor Amori Mikami.

Nevertheless, the reverse situation the not well adjusted children are more likely to display material that was hostile and inappropriate, she says.

Some people have been asking me lately if it makes sense to market a local event with social media. Now, abviously it depends on the industry and the importance and relevance of the topics presented at the event. As a general guideline I found this case study on Tim Patterson’s blog.

The main difference between a viral and a traditional (TV or cinema) commercial is that the viral is produced for the web (longer recording and playing time with more than 30 minutes, violating traditional commercial rules and addressing the buzz-effect) to be distributed amoungst web users in social networks. Lisa Barone just told us what it takes to go viral.

“It is the people that you want to see and pass on your content, they’re not necessarily customers.”

PS: This commercial by Prescriptionforchange.com is one of the latest examples showing a viral commercial production. And, people are discussing about it if it is good or not – this is another benefit you want to achieve with a viral: buzz, buzz, buzz….

Social Web: “When you decide to jump in, resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell.” – Interviewing Scott Monty

At the Detroit motor show 2010 Ford executives from around the world spent one entire day engaging with Ford Fans and online influencers on social web platforms like Twitter, Facebook, BlogTalkRadio, CoverItLive, and more.

TheStrategyWeb was given the chance to exchange some questions with Scott Monty, head of social media at FORD Motor Company, about the company’s digital tactics, the social web and their web-strategy.

Q: Scott, FORD has launched the new Ford Focus. How much was the design and product development influenced by the “One Ford” strategy and your social media activities?

Scott Monty The design and development process was very much a One Ford process. German-based Gunnar Hermann has been the lead for the new global C-car platform. He worked with a team of global engineers, including people such as Jens Ludmann and Jim Hughes, who are the Focus lead engineers in Europe and North America, respectively. While we’ve seen a steady stream of customers in the U.S. showing interest in the current generation of the Focus in Europe, the process for developing a global car was well underway before we implemented our social media strategy.

Q: In which way is the One Ford strategy influenced by your team’s social web activities, or vice versa?

Scott Monty When Alan Mulally joined Ford in September 2006, he set the company on a course of brand consolidation and product planning that incorporated the One Ford vision. Our business plan and communications goals were set, and our social media strategy was developed to support both.

Ford Alan Mulally and Scott Monty

Picture above: FORD CEO Alan Mullaly and Social Media Scott Monty at Detroit motor show C-level social media jam.

Q: What were the biggest challenges when the Ford top-management decided to implement a social web-strategy?

Scott Monty Surprisingly few. There has been no resistance to change, and indeed, there’s been an incredible interest in this developing field by a wide range of our most senior executives. While we’ve enjoyed success in our social media activities over the last year (especially in the U.S.), the challenge ahead of us is how we effectively scale the operations and how we roll it out regionally.

Q: How important is it for companies to have all employees understanding and living the social web engagement of the company?

Scott Monty To the extent that a company is involved in social media and invites a culture of participation and transparency, it’s vitally important. But more than just understanding the tools and platforms; what we’re talking about is cultural change and a transformation in the way we do business. If we can help employees to understand that, we’ll be successful regardless of what social network our strategy is executed on.

Q: How important is web-strategy for the Ford business today?

Scott Monty It is vitally important, as that’s where our customers are. It’s where they do their research and it’s increasingly where they’re having conversations about our brand. We’ve dedicated 25% of our marketing budget to digital and social media – more than twice the rate of others in our industry. And when you consider that consumers trust people like themselves more than companies, it’s vital for us to open up ourselves to them and have them experience our vehicles and tell their networks about us.

Q: Why should companies have a (social) web-strategy in place in the upcoming decade?

Scott Monty The web – particularly the mobile web – is increasingly where people are spending their time. When they first stop to research your product is Google, everything you and your customers do on the web is trackable. And it’s where your company’s reputation is being built, every day.

Q: What advice would you give to companies that think about setting up their social web-strategy?

Scott Monty Listen first. Take time to discover what people are saying about your business and to understand the unwritten rules of the online communities in which your customers participate. Become a member of those sites or networks and spend time looking around. And when you decide it’s time to jump in, resist the temptation to sell, sell, sell. People are on these sites to talk with each other, not to be marketed to. Try to provide value. Be helpful. Ask for feedback. Give them unique and interesting material they can’t get elsewhere. Doing all of this over time will build trust and a deeper relationship with your customer base.

Scott MontyTHX Scott for the time and your interesting insights!

About Scott Monty
Scott is head of social media for FORD Company. Or do you want his official title, then here you go: Global Digital & Multimedia Communications Manager. And he is a blogger. As a marketing and communications professional he has worked for a number of industries (healthcare, pharma, biotech, travel, automotive, tech, and communications), and numerous clients, from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. Today, he is a strategic advisor on all social media activities for FORD.

2010: Online ROI – a challenge for companies

mausThe solution to the following question is complex: How should companies measure online ROI in future? In times of display, affiliate and search advertising the measure of success has been kept very simple. Page impressions, clicks, leads, sales – that was it. With the evolution of social media the topic of online measurement has become more complex.

In the Pre-Web 2.0 era, there was a formula that has put everything else into the shadows. It was based on the clic. Obviously still many CMOs see this as the crucial measurement factor of their online activities. The click was considered the basis of the digital marketing manifesto.

The formula of the previous online ROI went something like this…

Page impressions and clicks to convert click-through rate that generates leads and ultimately (hopefully) sales.

And this formula also corresponded to the value in the online marketing of cost-per-mile (CMP), cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-lead (CPL), cost-per-sale (CPO). Simple, clear, pragmatic.

Marketers were satisfied, the sales man less (mostly) due to inferior leads and associated fluctuating revenues. There was a lack of transparency. The management is considered to be overstretched. 2010 everything will be different.

In 2009, the main German association for publishers and buyers, the IVW, killed the power of the page impression, the visit is the ‘Golden Surfer’ from now on. An English study by the Online Publishers Association (OPA) is following suit and strengthens the effectiveness of the ’silent click’ and the value of the context.

Moreover Eyeblaster invents, and especially Dean Donaldson promotes this, the Dwell Time. Efficiency measurement of web activity becomes a challenge for companies. And if we take it to the top companies do need an eye-movement study to measure the time-based attention, the way we know it from the print era (similar to copy-test).

Another challenge is that there are numerous social media activities added, and here we are looking for a reliable measurement method to justify the expenses. In Germany the Association of Social Media and Social Media is quickly introducing a new currency: share of voice or share of buzz. A conceptually coherent model , but in practice is questionable in its feasibility, management and marketing relevance. A similar measure as the CTR won’t be found in the social media industry, probably still for a long time. Probably not even 2010…

Let’s illustrate the complexity of measuring social media ROI at a viral campaign, the buzz generated by social media coverage and results. Previously, the click was relevant. It was a unique short-term assessment without measurement of long-term effect. With the ended of the campaign the measurement time was over. Whether the click came from the desired target group of bookers ranked in it’s relevance secondary.

In a viral campaign, however, due to the target-transparency, the question of efficiency measurement is completely different. All these values are quite different in context and only win in their semantic and concluding statement its relevance for the advertiser.

Questions arise such as …

How much time commitment gives the user his social activities and the commitment to the company?
How do I rate detailed comments on blogs, micro-blogs or social networks?
How to evaluate an Re-Tweet in this context?
From whom are the comments and actions coming?
How does buzz spread via this person and to whom?
How relevant is the target audience about the distribution for the advertisers?
How to integrate ratings in the measurement methog on video- or evaluation platforms?
What about the statements that I can not even see, because a front door at Social Networks is obstructing my access to the results?

Without individual-subjective definion of measuring units, each company, every Social Media ROI measurement is worthless, and social media marketing measurement fortiori. The metric must be defined in the relevant context of the desired outcome best possible – in other words the individual needs of the corporate strategy or intention of each social media activity has to be adjusted from case to case. Increase in visits to the website? Generation of Fans or Followers? Couponing on a community? Knowledge on brand confessions obtained? Or actually generate online sales?

Each profile of an active social median, its social graph, in its sustainability and its recommended value of inside and outside “of his” social community has different weight. Determine where the true relevant measurement is the responsibility of the advertiser. At the Webcific I have called the new monetary views as “cost-per-commitment” to provide the relativity of the word in question and to make clear the relevance of the word, but for the future.

Commitment begins with the communication to customers and does not stop when clients order at the company’s shop. However, maintaining the commitment of campaign spending via email or traditional online activities still is essential. As customers loyalty runs outside the social media spheres, too. Defining commitment as a measure of social media may be based different on the company blog than on Facebook or Twitter.

A crucial factor in the social web is always forgotten: Traditional marketing campaigns have a beginning and an end. That’s when Social Web communication starts…

The CPI formula in times of social web might be …

Reach and engagement convert to social activities that lead to multipliers, and (probably generate) revenues from sales.

The future of online ROI measurement should be driven on the basis of how much communication output must a company deliver through a variety of social media, until the customers brand promise is gaining credibility and creates customer communications. This leads to commitment, which I have just referred to as “social activities” that need to be defined. They are the drivers of the talks for the multiplication of messages from the public relations, marketing and sales department.

Spot On!
Measuring the Social Web ROI is a long term process. Metrics from shares, posts, comments, ratings or Tweets replace the old click-metric. For the new metrics remain the web’s property, thanks to social search integration. Communication is dynamic and it may be that the pure bookmark result of yesterday, generates many social activities and conversations tomorrow.
Who dominates social communication that generates brand-vangelist peers (as I always like to call it). From anonymous platforms users become now fans, followers, blog readers and community members. They all have names that are transparent, a huge advantage of today’s web-talks. In the decisive moment, when they start participating in the discussing companies can find important multipliers of the message of a brand or a company, and therefore define important parameters. But companies should remember that communication can take place anywhere and adjust according to their web strategy. This modern weaving culture should incorporate engagement metrics or policies between sales and marketing. Otherwise, the effort of monitoring, measuring, analyzing is worth nothing, and will not meet the result of the challenge of 2010.

News Update – Best of the Day

daily1Let your kids do social networking! Why? Parents might argue that social networking could “harm” their childrens education performance. A study by the University of New Hampshire now suggests that social networks aren’t as damaging to students’ grades as parents might think.

Earlier this year, Dominos was the negative example for social media usage in business. Now, they are coming back with their social media campaign “The Pizza Turnaround”.

And they are showing how customer feedback via social media can be used to reinvent the brand.

This year 2009 best commercial series? Have you ever seen the series of MINI’s convertible ads? Take your time and enjoy!

I am wishing all my readers a great and successful year 2010! Keep up the speed and in touch with The Strategy Web. THX for a fantastic year 2009!

Webstrategie 2010 – Gedanken zum Jahreswechsel

webstrategieDie Frage wurde mir in 2009 ein paar Mal gestellt und ich hab mich entschlossen, jetzt doch ein paar Worte zu schreiben. Der Jahreswechsel steht an, alle schreiben ihre Vorhersagungen für 2010 – selbst der Hausmeister schreibt mir mit Jahresgrüßen, worauf wir uns 2010 bei der Mülltrennung einstellen dürfen. Vorhersagungen gibt es bei The Strategy Web keine – es kommt eh alles anders als wir denken.

Die Frage meiner Kunden lautet:
“Worauf sollen wir denn im nächsten bei unserer Webstrategie achten?”
Ein Punkt vorweg: Die Internet-Marketing-Strategie ist nicht ihre Webstrategie – Webstrategie ist Businessstrategie!

Hier also meine Gedanken, die sie als Basis für ihre Webstrategie anstellen können, um mit ihrer Internet-Marketing Strategie erfolgreicher zu sein.

Die Webseite
Für viele Unternehmen ist die Webseite die zentrale Schaltstelle, an der sich Mitarbeiter orientieren, Partner Kooperationsmöglichkeiten evaluieren und mit der Kunden mit dem Unternehmen in Kontakt treten. Gerade im Zuge der Social Web Bewegung übersehen Business-Entscheider ihre Bedeutung. Man will überall sein, betreibt das (noch) Herzstück nur noch halbherzig und verliert hier potentielle Leads und zählbare Umsätze. Um eine optimierte Nutzbarkeit und “Zugangsperfektion” zu gewährleisten, sollten sie intern bei den Mitarbeiter und extern über einen Drittanbieter eine Usability-Studie durchführen (lassen).
Lassen sie Mitarbeiter und potentielle Kunden rund 8-10 Fragen zum Look-and-Fell, Navigation und Usability beantworten. Und scheuen sie sich nicht, dies online wie offline (audio/video) zu machen. Der Vergleichstest zwischen alter Webseite und der nach einem Relaunch (A/B Test) sollte einen klaren Upside bei den Business KPI’s und dem Online ROI hervorbringen. Und das nicht nur kurzfristig…

Das/Die Blog/s
Wenn sie noch nicht bloggen, sollten sie damit anfangen. Die Benefits sind vielfältig: Community-Building, Assoziation mit Themen rund um ihr Business, Positionierung einer Vorreiterschaft, Offene Echtzeit-Kundenkommunikation und… SEO-Effizienz. Die Chance von organischer Suche zu profitieren, ist mit einem Blog höher als mit einer klassischen Webseite, aufgrund inhaltlicher Genauigkeit, relevanter Aktualität und der interaktiven Dialogs. Prämisse: Der Blogaufwand muß auch der organischen Suche gerecht werden.

SEM/SEO
Wer im eigenen “Webhaus” sitzt, sucht dort seltenst. Haben sie schonmal nach ihren Keywörter durch externe Personen suchen lassen? Oder Kunden ihre SEM/SEO Taktiken nachvollziehen lassen? Oft ist es angenehm und kostengünstig, die Aufgabe selbst zu übernehmen. Ob man dabei aber neuen Input oder Ideen zu neuen Ansätzen bekommt? Der externe Einblick offeriert die Sinnhaftigkeitsüberprüfung ihrer Vorgehensweise – die so richtig wie falsch sein kann. Einen Test ist es definitiv wert, oder?

Email-Marketing
Fast alle Unternehmen haben ihre Prozesse und vergessen dabei den Kunden, der das Unternehmen “beim Wort nimmt”. Das fängt an beim ordentlichen Umgang mit Mailing-Datenbanken, ansprechenden Überschriften, inhaltlicher Aussage, etc. Oft wird dem Tag oder der Uhrzeit der Aussendung wenig Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt – ein bitterer Fehler. Manchmal kann eine Kampagne an einem Tag schlechter ausfallen als am anderen, obwohl das Mailing und die Liste identisch ist. Kurze Zusammenfassungen am Anfang sind hilfreich und teasern erfolgreiche Inhalte vergangener Kampagnen.

Social Media
Social Networks wie Facebook, Twitter, XING oder LinkedIn sind derzeit sehr populär. Auch ihre Kunden sind dort und investieren viel Zeit darin. Sei es, weil man sich als Fan oder Follower einer Marke, eines Produktes oder eines Services bekennt und zu erkennen gibt, oder weil man auf ein Schäppchen hofft, oder kollaborieren will mit dem Hersteller, oder nach besserem Kundenservice sucht. ‘Lernen und Empfehlen’ sind die Treiber des Social Web, ein großes Plus für wache Unternehmen und Marken. Hören sie hin, ob und wo ihre Kunden sind, sprechen sie an und ja: Sie dürfen noch Fehler machen… Nobody is perfect. Aber hören sie auf, Monologe zu führen (gerade im Social Web).

Social PR
PR Releases gehören zwar noch dazu – effizienter ist Social PR. Platzieren Sie ihre Pressemitteilungen bei populären Blogs oder bei im Page Rank hochwertigen sowie generell stark verlinkten Seiten. Eine noch viel zu wenig genutzte Taktik, vor allem im Produkt Marketing. Wie wenig Firmen nutzen die Chance, einfach mal ein Produkt oder Gadget zu platzieren (Backlinks!). Es bringt Traffic und zieht Medien Anfragen nach sich, um sich als Vordenker oder Experte zu plazieren. Etwaige Effekte zugunsten der Auffindbarkeit ihres Businesses, der Produkte und Services bei Suchergebnissen mal ganz außen vor gelassen. Vergessen sie nicht, daß die Echtzeit-Suche kommt – nutzen sie dies als Wettbewerbsvorsprung…

Display Werbung
Die gute alte Banner- oder Text-Ad Kampagne hat noch lange nicht ausgedient – aber sie gehört in ihrer Anspruchsdenke bei Marketiers reformiert. Wer eine Branding-Kampagne startet, darf keine Leads erwarten. Und eine Lead-Kampagne braucht ein Call-To-Action mit Benefit für den Kunden. “Hier klicken für mehr Infos…” ist zu wenig. Dazu braucht der User keine Aufforderung. Dazu sollte das Creative bereits anregen. Und noch etwas: Banner- und Search-Marketing ergänzen sich; ersetzen können sie sich gegenseitig nicht.

Online Kunden-Service
Angefangen bei Kampagnen Landing Pages über die klassische Kontaktseite bis hin zum Twitter-Account: Was im Echtzeit-Web zählt ist die Reaktionszeit. Zwischenzeitliche Tests, die ich mit Kollegen und Freunden ab und zu durchführe, zeigen hier unfassbare Ergebnisse. Manche Großunternehmen haben offensichtlich keine CRM-Policy (oder leben diese nicht), oder sie ignorieren ihre Kunden im Gedanken an die Massen(umsätze). Aber mit dem Social Web kann sich diese Welt schnell verändern. Auch hier hilft A/B Testing hervorragend und ist zwingend von Nöten. Nur so bleibt die CRM Strategie aktuell und sie haben auch zukünftig ihr Ohr am Kunden. Denn am Schluß bestimmt der Kunde, ob er mit ihrem Online Angebot umgehen will, oder nicht.

Web-Analyse
Viele Marketiers tracken ihre Webergebnisse und machen auch ihre Analysen, manche werden sogar Benchmarks haben. Diese Benchmarks dürften sich 2010 verschieben, da sich die Intensität und Länge der Aufmerksamkeit zugunsten des Brands und der Produkte neuen Einflüssen aus dem Social Web weichen dürften. Wo man früher den Click und dem Visit die Hoheit gönnte, rückt auf einmal die soziale Koversion in den Vordergrund, die soziale Aktivität der Kunden. Und die kann sich in Gesprächen, Ratings, Reviews oder Kommentaren zeigen. Metriken werden sich verädern und Benchmarks werden überdacht werden. Und so werden Dollars aus reaktivem Sales entstehen – eine vollkommen neue Form des Kundendialogs.

Webstrategie ist eine Herausforderung, die 2010 aufgrund der spannenden und schnellen Entwicklung des Web weiterhin faszinierend sein wird. Ich wünsche Ihnen viel Erfolg bei ihren Bemühungen und der Weiterentwicklung ihrer Businessstrategie.

Nächste Seite »

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes