Neurological study: Bad websites causing ‘web-stress’

Bad designed websites and slow loading times are causing ‘web stress’ for internet users. This is the result of a new neurological study by CA in cooperation one of the leading customer experience and consultancy consulting firms Foviance. The study even shows that bad websites have a negative effect on the users health.

During the study, which was conducted at the Glasgow Caledonian University, volunteers (eight women and five men between the age of 25 and 42 years) were wired up to sophisticated neurological and physiological testing equipment (incl. an Electroencephalography cap) which was used to monitor brain wave activity. The volunteers carried out a series of everyday online tasks such as finding and buying a laptop PC and travel insurance. During the test the internet connection was slowed down to increase the stress factor.

With the generated data, CA and Foviance found the two most stressful points of the online sales cycle which caused a high level of ‘web-stress’: search and checkout. Although the volunteers completed the purchase, more than three quarters of customers will abandon the site in reality. And it took the volunteers up to a minute to recover from that ‘web stress’.

This result corresponds with CAs Web Stress Index study. In 2009 CA interviewed 2500 consumers. The key finding was that slow loading websites were a frustrating experience for 92% of the repondents. No wonder that volunteers in the experiment were leaving bad websites, or wanted to call the company’s hotline

“The results of this study sends out a clear message – businesses need to reduce ‘web stress’ and improve the online experience of their customers if they’re going to maximise returns from their web channel” (…) It’s not just about website design or internet connection speeds – the performance of a website is dependent on the performance of the web applications that support it. Businesses need an Application Performance Management (APM)** solution which not only provides real insight into how customers are experiencing their web applications, but will proactively manage the performance and availability of these applications. This translates into better customer service, improved brand loyalty and increased sales.”
Kobi Korsah, Director, EMEA Product Marketing, CA

And Foviance adds…

“Consumers have very high expectations of web applications and web sites – to be always available and instantly responsive. This experiment simulated the experience of underperforming web applications for our volunteers. The results show that when online expectations aren’t met, people quickly become agitated, confused and have to concentrate 50% more than normal. All these problems can be detected and prevented as long as businesses take a proactive approach to measuring the customer’s experience of web applications.”
Catriona Campbell, Director and Founder, Foviance and leading behavioural psychologist

Spot On!
In the summer of 2009, Akamai already revealed that 2 seconds is the new threshold of acceptability for eCommerce websites response times. The study showed that 40% of consumers won’t wait more than 3 seconds for a web page to load before leaving the site. This study by CA and Foviance makes this clear again: Corporations should have a close testing eye on the essential features (loading time for search and checkout) in order not to affect online shopping revenues. Especially if you bear in mind that online retail is predicted to grow to 320 billion EUR in 2011. More information can be found in this video on the CA study.

Twitter bei KMU noch nicht angekommen

Auch wenn viele in der Businesswelt über die Vorteile von Twitter sprechen, wie weiteres Informationsmedium, Kundenbindung und -service, Adressierung von Sales-Promotions, Erweiterterung des Marketing-Sprachrohrs, und so weiter. Twitter bietet bei richtiger Nutzung viele Möglichkeit, aber…

Bei den kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen ist Twitter noch nicht wirklich angekommen. In Deutschland zeigt sich hier ein ähnliches Bild wie in UK. Zu diesem Ergebnis kommt eine aktuelle Befragung im Rahmen des vom Netzwerk Elektronischer Geschäftsverkehr entwickelten Online-Ratgebers zum Thema Website-Gestaltung.

Nur 10% der 1.600 teilnehmenden Unternehmen setzen Twitter als “multimediales Element” ein. Dabei sind in 91% der befragten Unternehmen weniger als 50 Mitarbeiter beschäftigt. Die Gründe hierfür könnten mannigfaltig sein. Die Befragung kommt in ihrer Aussagekraft an diesem Punkt zu kurz. Wäre es doch gerade interessant zu wissen, ob Resourcenmangel, mangelndes Interesse oder fehlendes Wissen die Gründe für den nicht-Einsatz von Twitter sind.

Mittels 12 kurzer Fragen wurde überprüft, welche gestalterischen, organisatorischen, technischen und rechtlichen Anforderungen die Website der befragten Unternehmen erfüllt. Die Antworten ermöglichten den Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmern individuelle Handlungsanleitungen zur Verbesserung ihrer Website zu erkennen (und bei besonderem Erfolg auch an einem Website Award teilzunehmen).

Entwickelt wurde der Ratgeber vom Netzwerk Elektronischer Geschäftsverkehr im Rahmen des vom Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) geförderten Projekts “KMU-orientierte Website-Gestaltung”. Er ermöglicht Unternehmen, online und in wenigen Schritten eine kostenlose Einstiegsberatung zur professionellen Gestaltung Ihrer Unternehmens-Website zu erhalten.

News Update – Best of the Day

This news update reads like: Back to the Roots.

Skittles changes their website strategy. Not even a year ago, Skittles has chosen to set up a social media hub website against a traditional website. Last week, the Skittles site has been relaunched and ends their extreme social media outfit – just the small social network logos on top indicate their social media engagement. Nevertheless, the PR effect was and is massive for them. Just the right time to use it for the launch of their new Twitter page…

The iPad drives the media in the world crazy and has ruled the news in the last weeks. Now, a recent study (poll) shows the customer’s buying desire for an Apple tablet both pre- and post iPad keynote. The results show that before the speech there were 26% saying they DON’T want to buy an iPad and after it, the numbers has increased to 52%!

The super bowl season 2010 is over. The winner is the team from the New Orleans Saints – Congrats guys – well done! After the final the first question is: Which TV commercial was the best (see a selection on The Strategy Web YouTube channel). My vote goes to Volkswagen. It’s about a funny game (Every time you see a VW drive by, you punch a friend.), it’s carries cool characters, creates suspense and the company advertizes with the German claim: Das Auto – and not ‘the car’ or ‘the auto’. Isn’t that authentic? Back to the rootes! So, take care when I am standing next to you next time…

Is customer-centric business the future?

In the last 12 years, the credo of my business life was “Customer First!”. It surprises and disappoints me when I experience poor customer service. Or when I hear from unhappy friends, colleagues or relatives telling me stories about how companies treat the centre of their business: customers.

Last week, when I was thinking about how to leverage this to a higher level, I came across a modern business strategy vision by Ranjay Gulati, Harvard Business School professor and author of the book “Reorganize for Resilience: Putting Customers at the Center of Your Business“. In the following video Gulati tells us how to deliver what customers really want.

Reorienting vs. Reorganizing
Ranjay Gulati sees the fundamental changes appropriate for some movement in company processes. Customers have more information, more choices on products while companies are facing global competition. So, businesses have to think about their business (not only marketing or sales efforts!) and how it operates.

Redefining vs. Reinventing
The analysis of the customer base might show that the website is designed for male while the majority of the users might be female. So, we need to ask questions like “Who are my customers?”, “How do my customers shop?”, or “What do they really want?”.

Gulati explains with the latest success of Best Buy how women and men shop. At that point, he also hints to the upsale opportunity of recommendations.

Success for businesses, he believes, comes from “Inside-Out-Perspective”. Companies don’t have to produce everything themselves but need to make the client happy like Apple with the iPhone. 90% of the inputs are not made by Apple. The same occurs to the apps in the Apple store where Apple basically just orchestrates the customers wishes.

“Make this identity shift. I am not here to sell what I produce – I am here to solve a set of customer problems (…) and actually acting on that!”

How to get to a customer-centric business…
1. Shifting mindset: the intention to solve customer problems.
2. Sense of curiosity and humility: the wish to understand your customers.
3. Make a creative leap: the will to understand their needs.
4. Align the elements in the organization: the motivation to live the customer-centric business.

Spot On!
Interested to get your view on this modern business strategy. Let us know what you think about customer-centric business. Or do you think the social web will be leading us towards this business process anyway?

BreakingPoint: Insights in their social media strategy

Yesterday, I was refering to the case study by BreakingPoint to show the impact of social media for lead generation. And I promised to get some feedback from the responsible person at BreakingPoint on how they made these results happen. Kyle Flaherty gave me some insights in BreakiingPoint Systems social media strategy which I am allowed to share with you.

In his eyes, the succes of companies with social media needs to follow a company’s philosophy in a way that “social media should not be a separate entity in the marketing or communications strategy, in fact it must be part of your company DNA if it is to be successful.”

The main question I was asking myself was how they at BreakingPoint organize their social media activities and content production. Kyle told me that it was a long learning curve. Today, he is working with a team of eight bloggers (all highly technical) who fill their Twitter program (nearly 25% of company members are on Twitter), Facebook, LinkedIn Groups, corporate blog, etc. And he describes the content production process as follows:

“For our blog it is a very organic process, which I believe works best. I send notes out to potential bloggers each month discussing certain themes and asking if folks are working on anything in particular. This sparks some thoughts around blog posts, which they send my way for editing and SEO. As for LinkedIn, every member is put through a qualification process and given very clear engagement rules for the group. I enforce these from time to time by explaining to people how they should engage, kicking out spammers, etc. I also will go into the group on a daily basis and pose a question to start up conversation and ask particular members to respond in order to facilitate communication.”

The question of people who want to involved in social media is always: What is the overall investment in starting social media activities? Kyle responds that the investment was not massive spendings. Although it has to be said that Kyle managed web development projects for years in his last job which probably saved the company some dollars.

“Two specific areas we spend money when it comes to social media. First is with equipment for podcasts and video, which is an important element of our social media strategy. In 2009 I spent only $2,000 (U.S) for equipment. The other element is our website and the development of a new blog (debuting in February!). This is obviously a more substantial cost, but one we would have done no matter what. In my opinion a good site development, depending on what you are doing, can be done for around $15,000 (note that I managed web dev projects for years in my last job). Otherwise our budget is spent on “traditional” marketing areas such as drip email marketing, events, demand gen, etc. But it is important to note that we integrate social media with each of these elements.“

From a sustainability point of view it is often argued that social media can save money as a positive factor compared to traditional marketing. Kyle tells me that using social media is not a tactic to save money but that the budgets spent follow the same KPI rules of traditional marketing efforts.

“We worry less about saving money and more about making our activities work for us. For example, we map nearly every dollar spent back to sales. If a marketing activity, whether traditional or social media focused, is not brining in sales we do not engage in that activity for much longer.”

Today, 30% of their generated leads are coming from social media activities – and all leads are new contacts.

Kyle Flaherty is Director Marketing and Communications and manages external communications, community relationships and influencer marketing at BreakingPoint. He also blogs on b2b marketing topics on his personal blog Dance with strangers.

Eine Orientierungshilfe zum weltweiten Agieren

In Zeiten der Rezession sind Unternehmen gezwungen, sich der neuen Wirtschaftslage zu stellen und aktiv nach neuen Geschäftsmöglichkeiten zu suchen, wo immer sich diese bieten. Dass die globale Wirtschaft ins Stocken geraten ist, soll gewiss nicht bedeuten, dass auch die Wachstumsinitiativen von Unternehmen diesem Beispiel folgen müssen.

Unternehmen jeder Größe können sich neue internationale Märkte erschließen, wenn sie sich richtig vermarkten. Der Wunsch, sich in schwierigen Zeiten anzupassen und zu wachsen, muss jedoch von den geeigneten Tools unterstützt werden. Allzu leicht investiert man eine große Geldsumme in eine „Lösung“, ohne zu wissen, wie das tatsächliche Ergebnis dieser Investition aussieht. Vor dem Investieren beachtlicher Ressourcen im Rahmen einer internationalen Marketing-Strategie ist es wichtig, zunächst auszuprobieren, was funktioniert.

Für die meisten Verbraucher, die auf der Suche nach neuen Dienstleistungen oder Produkten sind, ist das Internet heutzutage die erste Anlaufstelle. Es versteht sich daher wohl von selbst, dass der Schlüssel für internationales Wachstum darin liegt, wie optimal ein Unternehmen die Möglichkeiten seiner Website ausschöpft.

Website-Lokalisierung und Suchmaschinenoptimierung (SEO) ist eine kostengünstige Möglichkeit zur Erschließung neuer Märkte. Es kostet nur ein paar Hundert Euro, eine einfache, textbasierte Website in einer anderen Sprache einzurichten. Obwohl die Mehrheit des Internets stark vom Englischen durchdrungen ist, ist Englisch für die Mehrheit der Internetbenutzer nicht deren Muttersprache. Hier herrscht ein klares Missverhältnis, dass Unternehmen ausschöpfen sollten.

Zuerst muss festgestellt werden, ob in einem bestimmten Land für den von Ihnen angebotenen Service überhaupt ein Bedarf besteht. Dies lässt sich am besten am Wettbewerb vor Ort ablesen. Wenn es bereits ähnliche Organisationen in diesem Markt gibt, ist dies ein gutes Zeichen, da es eine echte Nachfrage demonstriert. Hüten Sie sich jedoch vor zu vielen Mitbewerbern, da es äußerst schwierig ist, in einen bereits gesättigten Markt einzudringen.

Haben Sie festgestellt, dass tatsächlich eine Nachfrage besteht, identifizieren Sie die wichtigen Suchbegriffe, die von den Internetbenutzern der Region verwendet werden. Google und Yahoo bieten einige kostenfreie Tools zur Keyword-Bestimmung an, über die Sie diejenigen Suchbegriffe erfahren, die im gewünschten Auslandsmarkt verwendet werden.

Diese wichtigen Ausdrücke sollten anschließend in eine professionell übersetzte Website eingebettet werden, um organisch die Ranking-Position dieser Website in den Suchmaschinen zu optimieren. Es ist möglich, in ausländischen Suchmaschinen-Rankings ziemlich rasch aufzusteigen, ganz einfach deshalb, weil die Sättigung der wichtigen Suchbegriffe in anderen Sprachen als im Englischen bei weitem geringer ist.

Um das Ganze ins Rollen zu bringen, können Sie das Abrechnungsmodell Pay per Click (PPC) oder Internet-Werbung, wie zum Beispiel AdWords von Google, nutzen. So erhöhen Sie durch einen „gesponserten Link“ den Datenverkehr auf Ihrer Website. Das Schöne an PPC ist, dass Sie Ihr Budget im Voraus festlegen können – selbst eine unerhebliche Summe von €5, falls dies gewünscht ist. Sie können den Wert von PPC einschätzen, ohne große Summen investieren zu müssen. Das Risiko ist also wirklich minimal.

Wie bereits erwähnt, hat sich Englisch zur globalen Handelssprache und zur Verkehrssprache des Internets entwickelt. Man sollte sich aber klar machen, dass drei Viertel der Weltbevölkerung überhaupt kein Englisch spricht.

Die Notwendigkeit, dass Unternehmen ihre internationalen Konsumenten in ihrer jeweiligen Muttersprache ansprechen, kann daher nicht genug betont werden. Wenn auch Englisch die am weitesten verbreitete erste Fremdsprache ist, bleibt es eine Tatsache, dass die meisten Verbraucher zuerst in ihrer eigenen Muttersprache nach Dienstleistungen/ Produkten suchen.

Ein Unternehmen, das geschäftlich weltweit agieren will, muss also in der Lage sein, in jedem Land „wie ein Einheimischer zu denken“. Das heißt, Sie müssen die Vielzahl kultureller und linguistischer Vielschichtigkeiten berücksichtigen, denen Sie begegnen, wenn Sie in neue ausländische Märkte eindringen wollen.

Nehmen wir zum Beispiel die französische Sprache in Frankreich und Kanada (Québecer Französisch). Sie ist weitgehend identisch, aber dennoch gibt es hinreichende dialektische Unterschiede zwischen diesen Ausprägungen des Französischen, so dass für ein gezieltes Ansprechen jedes Marktes gesonderte Marketing-Strategien notwendig sind.

Um dies an einem Beispiel zu verdeutlichen: „E-Mail“ heißt in Frankreich schlichtweg email, in Kanada jedoch courrier électronique (wörtlich: „elektronische Post“). Und während ein déjeuner in Frankreich „Mittagessen“ bedeutet, meint man damit in Belgien und in der Schweiz das „Frühstück“.

Es gibt zahlreiche solcher Unterschiede zwischen den französischen Sprachvarianten in Frankreich, Kanada, Belgien und der Schweiz, die die Bedeutung des richtigen Lokalisierens Ihrer Dienstleistungen für jeden speziellen Zielmarkt hervorheben. Gleichermaßen verhält es sich auch mit den Sprachen Deutsch (Deutschland)/Schweizerdeutsch, Portugiesisch (Portugal)/Brasilianisches Portugiesisch, Spanisch (Spanien)/Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch und, ganz in der Nähe, Britisches und US-amerikanisches Englisch.

Sprachen spielen daher im Globalisierungsprozess eine zentrale Rolle. Unternehmen jeder Größe könnten von Website-Lokalisierung und SEO profitieren. Eine Firma in den eigenen vier Wänden kann mit nichts weiter als einem vernetzten PC und etwas unternehmerischer Intelligenz weltweit agieren, ohne dafür Unsummen zu investieren.

Über den Autor
Gastautor Christian Arno ist Geschäftsführer und Gründer des internationalen Übersetzungsunternehmens Lingo24.

Das im Jahr 2001 gegründete Unternehmen ist auf vier Kontinenten für Kunden in über 60 Ländern tätig. Im vergangenen Jahr hat Lingo24 mehr als 30 Millionen Wörter für Unternehmen aus jedem Branchensektor übersetzt. Im Jahr 2009 betrugen die Einkünfte des Unternehmens €4 Mio.

2010: Online ROI – a challenge for companies

The solution to the following question is complex: How should companies measure online ROI in future? In times of display, affiliate and search advertising the measure of success has been kept very simple. Page impressions, clicks, leads, sales – that was it. With the evolution of social media the topic of online measurement has become more complex.

In the Pre-Web 2.0 era, there was a formula that has put everything else into the shadows. It was based on the clic. Obviously still many CMOs see this as the crucial measurement factor of their online activities. The click was considered the basis of the digital marketing manifesto.

The formula of the previous online ROI went something like this…

Page impressions and clicks to convert click-through rate that generates leads and ultimately (hopefully) sales.

And this formula also corresponded to the value in the online marketing of cost-per-mile (CMP), cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-lead (CPL), cost-per-sale (CPO). Simple, clear, pragmatic.

Marketers were satisfied, the sales man less (mostly) due to inferior leads and associated fluctuating revenues. There was a lack of transparency. The management is considered to be overstretched. 2010 everything will be different.

In 2009, the main German association for publishers and buyers, the IVW, killed the power of the page impression, the visit is the ‘Golden Surfer’ from now on. An English study by the Online Publishers Association (OPA) is following suit and strengthens the effectiveness of the ’silent click’ and the value of the context.

Moreover Eyeblaster invents, and especially Dean Donaldson promotes this, the Dwell Time. Efficiency measurement of web activity becomes a challenge for companies. And if we take it to the top companies do need an eye-movement study to measure the time-based attention, the way we know it from the print era (similar to copy-test).

Another challenge is that there are numerous social media activities added, and here we are looking for a reliable measurement method to justify the expenses. In Germany the Association of Social Media and Social Media is quickly introducing a new currency: share of voice or share of buzz. A conceptually coherent model , but in practice is questionable in its feasibility, management and marketing relevance. A similar measure as the CTR won’t be found in the social media industry, probably still for a long time. Probably not even 2010…

Let’s illustrate the complexity of measuring social media ROI at a viral campaign, the buzz generated by social media coverage and results. Previously, the click was relevant. It was a unique short-term assessment without measurement of long-term effect. With the ended of the campaign the measurement time was over. Whether the click came from the desired target group of bookers ranked in it’s relevance secondary.

In a viral campaign, however, due to the target-transparency, the question of efficiency measurement is completely different. All these values are quite different in context and only win in their semantic and concluding statement its relevance for the advertiser.

Questions arise such as …

How much time commitment gives the user his social activities and the commitment to the company?
How do I rate detailed comments on blogs, micro-blogs or social networks?
How to evaluate an Re-Tweet in this context?
From whom are the comments and actions coming?
How does buzz spread via this person and to whom?
How relevant is the target audience about the distribution for the advertisers?
How to integrate ratings in the measurement methog on video- or evaluation platforms?
What about the statements that I can not even see, because a front door at Social Networks is obstructing my access to the results?

Without individual-subjective definion of measuring units, each company, every Social Media ROI measurement is worthless, and social media marketing measurement fortiori. The metric must be defined in the relevant context of the desired outcome best possible – in other words the individual needs of the corporate strategy or intention of each social media activity has to be adjusted from case to case. Increase in visits to the website? Generation of Fans or Followers? Couponing on a community? Knowledge on brand confessions obtained? Or actually generate online sales?

Each profile of an active social median, its social graph, in its sustainability and its recommended value of inside and outside “of his” social community has different weight. Determine where the true relevant measurement is the responsibility of the advertiser. At the Webcific I have called the new monetary views as “cost-per-commitment” to provide the relativity of the word in question and to make clear the relevance of the word, but for the future.

Commitment begins with the communication to customers and does not stop when clients order at the company’s shop. However, maintaining the commitment of campaign spending via email or traditional online activities still is essential. As customers loyalty runs outside the social media spheres, too. Defining commitment as a measure of social media may be based different on the company blog than on Facebook or Twitter.

A crucial factor in the social web is always forgotten: Traditional marketing campaigns have a beginning and an end. That’s when Social Web communication starts…

The CPI formula in times of social web might be …

Reach and engagement convert to social activities that lead to multipliers, and (probably generate) revenues from sales.

The future of online ROI measurement should be driven on the basis of how much communication output must a company deliver through a variety of social media, until the customers brand promise is gaining credibility and creates customer communications. This leads to commitment, which I have just referred to as “social activities” that need to be defined. They are the drivers of the talks for the multiplication of messages from the public relations, marketing and sales department.

Spot On!
Measuring the Social Web ROI is a long term process. Metrics from shares, posts, comments, ratings or Tweets replace the old click-metric. For the new metrics remain the web’s property, thanks to social search integration. Communication is dynamic and it may be that the pure bookmark result of yesterday, generates many social activities and conversations tomorrow.
Who dominates social communication that generates brand-vangelist peers (as I always like to call it). From anonymous platforms users become now fans, followers, blog readers and community members. They all have names that are transparent, a huge advantage of today’s web-talks. In the decisive moment, when they start participating in the discussing companies can find important multipliers of the message of a brand or a company, and therefore define important parameters. But companies should remember that communication can take place anywhere and adjust according to their web strategy. This modern weaving culture should incorporate engagement metrics or policies between sales and marketing. Otherwise, the effort of monitoring, measuring, analyzing is worth nothing, and will not meet the result of the challenge of 2010.

Paid Advertising 2010: What changes for marketers?

Seeing 2010 from a paid advertising perspective, we might argue that business will only change slightly for marketers. Paid advertising won’t die this year, right?

Now, eMarketer published a statement by their analyst Debra Aho Williamson on social media ad spending forecasts which touches the “tiny” shift in paid advertising:

“Paid advertising will not be the primary focus, but it will serve to drive traffic and engagement with the larger social network presence.”

The main difference will be that paid advertising is story-telling about a social media presence (also offline with print ads or bill boards) instead of selling their a traditional business website. Is this not already a massive movement in the ad industry? Paid advertising promotions are not about business websites. It is pushing the company’s social web presence.

Nevertheless, marketers still have their targets on contacts, leads and conversions. And they still need to reach a lot of these targets by promoting their web-presence offerings with online advertising, be it display, text-ads or search. I assume that product marketing has no other option here. The modern social web world calls this generating “engagement”. Just a nicer wording than talking about leads and sales?

The term “engagement” was discussed intensely by Jason Falls, Tim Schigel and me in the last weeks. But don’t we not all know that generating engagement is nothing new in the advertising world.

The word “engagement” is one of the most hyped words on the modern social web platforms like blogs, Facebook or Twitter? In my eyes engagement has become a buzzword 2.0. And, most of us media dinosaurs wonder how the ROI in paid advertising on social media platforms will evolve and how to measure it compared to the old paid advertising measurement on pis, visits or clicks.

The difference is that this modern engagement shall be generated, established and converted via dialogue, resulting in a close business-customer relationship – instead of people clicking banners or links, sending emails or filling out contact forms on landing pages. In the end, everything serves one purpose: customers shall buy products – online or offline.

But what if customers are starting conversations on the platforms that are promoted via paid advertising? Conversations is new in the paid advertising world. And it is more time-consuming, more challenging, and a more sensitive topic than waiting for a customer to respond on i.e. bannering the traditional online way.

Ten years ago, companies owned the road that was leading customers to get engaged with them. Today, the social web owns a ring-road around a company or brand with hundreds of roads linking, talking and refering to a company. The strategic question for paid search could be: Which one is your main access-point for the near, middle and long-time future?

PS: In order to maintain the customer dialogue companies need the right resources. So, the challenge businesses have is setting up their social web-strategy before they start spending on paid advertising. There is no other way for companies to support customer needs for a long lasting business sustainability.

Spot On!
Paid advertising continues to serve finding access to the modern customer’s world. But let’s ask marketers: Is there a difference if paid advertising is promoting a social media presence or a traditional business website? Will the work for marketers and media planers be the same? Only the links will be different? If you know how to serve, sell and talk to customers, the work and business that is aiming at “engagement” won’t change compared to 50 years ago. It will remain to be hard work…? No matter, what paid advertising is promoting, right?

News Update – Best of the Day

Website development is one of the biggest challenges in the web-strategy business. Eric Riess has written a tremendous list of 10 does and don’ts of website development which every CIO, marketer, sales boss and CEO should read.

The holiday season is the time of top lists for everything – also for websites. The Guardian has created a list of the 100 essential websites. Curious what you think about it… let me know which site was your favorite in 2009.

A commercial just for boys? – Anyway. My christmas present to my male readers. Or also for my female readers? Just tell your husbands which one looks best at you. Be sure, he is going to buy it.

Heinz Ketchup wird Mitmachmarke 2.0

Die Marke Heinz Ketchup befindet sich in einem Wandlungsprozess. Erst Anfang des Jahres hat man nach 70 Jahren das Logo geändert. Nun zeigt sich in Deutschland der Webauftritt in neuem Gewande. Man hat offensichtlich ordentlich darin investiert und macht aus sich eine Mitmachmarke 2.0. Unter dem Titel “Open Sauce” geht man mit einer neuen Social Media Strategie ins Rennen.

Geht man auf heinzketchup.de bietet der Ketchuphersteller zahlreiche Web 2.0 Features, um sich mit “Heinz History 2.0″ zu assoziieren. Man kann seine Heinz Bilder auf Flickr hochladen, über YouTube wird ein Video Generator geboten sowie ein neuer TV Spot aus UK präsentiert. Selbstredend kann man auch Fan der Facebook Page werden… und das -theoretisch- alles ohne Seite zu verlassen. Und auch E-Commerce kommt nicht zu kurz: Im Markenshop gibt es vom Fahrrad über die Handtasche bis hin zum Serviettenspender so ziemlich alles, was man braucht (oder auch nicht).

Zum Start hat Heinz die Aktion “I love Ketchup” ins Leben gerufen und ruft zur Neugestaltung der Flaschenetiketten auf durch die Fans. Die Gewinner-Labels kommen Anfang 2010 auf einer Million Heinz-Flaschen als limitierte Edition in den Handel.

Spot On!
Die Idee der Webseite gefällt und ist ansprechend. Das Vogelgezwitscher im Hintergrund erinnert ein wenig an den Sommer in den derzeit kalten und unfreundlichen Tagen, was irgendwie angenehm ist. Für die Realisierung und Betreuung der Marken-Website zeichnet die Agentur Raumzwo aus Berlin verantwortlich. Die Kommunikationsstrategie kommt vom Heinz-Marketing-Team inhouse mit dem Berater Justus Hug, früherer Leiter New Media von Mast-Jägermeister.

PS: Die Log-Ins haben bei mir leider noch etwas gehakelt, aber das verbuchen wir mal unter dem Label “technische Herausforderungen 2.0″.

Nächste Seite »